Percepción y causación: apuntes para la construcción de una crítica a la teoría de la integración conceptual de Fauconnier y Turner
Perception and causation: notes for the construction of a critique of the theory of conceptual integration of Fauconnier and Turner
Percepção e causação: notas para a construção de uma crítica à teoria da integração conceitual de Fauconnier e Turner
Abstract (en)
The main questions concerning the binding in experience of the diverse aspects of vision (color, shape, movement, etc.) that are processed in different and distant cortical areas of the human brain, find a possible answer in Gilles Fauconnier and Mark Turner’s proposal about conceptual integration as the main cognitive operation behind human reasoning. Such a possible answer reveals upon analysis, which are some of the limits that the authors’ proposal should appoint.Abstract (es)
Abstract (pt)
References
Barsalou, W. L. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 577-660.
Bob, P. (2011). Brain, mind and consciousness: Advances
in neuroscience research. Nueva York: Springer.
Fauconnier, G. (1994). Mental spaces: aspects of meaning construction in natural language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fauconnier, G. y Turner, M. (2002). The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. Nueva York: Basic Books.
Johnson, M. (1990). The body in the mind: The bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination and Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago.
Mandler, J. M. (2004). The foundations of mind: origins of conceptual thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pascual, E. (2012). Los espacios mentales y la integración conceptual. En Ibarretxe y Valenzuela (Dirs.). Lingüística cognitiva. Barcelona: Anthropos.
Treisman, A. (1996). The binding problem. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 6, 171-178.
How to Cite
License
Hallazgos Journal is under license Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)





