Emprendimiento social: una revisión sistemática de la literatura
Social Entrepreneurship: A Systematic Literature Review
Empreendedorismo social: uma revisão sistemática da bibliografia
Resumen (es)
La literatura sobre el emprendimiento social ha cobrado importancia. Sin embargo, se encuentra fragmentada en el ámbito académico y para facilitar su unificación necesita un marco teórico. El objetivo de este artículo es presentar una revisión crítica del estado de la investigación sobre el emprendimiento social y evaluar las perspectivas favorables de abordaje. Para esto, se analizaron 94 artículos científicos disponibles y distribuidos en diferentes bases de datos: Scopus, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, Ebsco y Google Scholar, publicados entre el 2000 y el 2020. La indagación permitió comprobar la evolución sobre el emprendimiento social durante los últimos años. No obstante, los hallazgos muestran limitaciones en el análisis del tema. Por ejemplo, se evidenció la dificultad de conceptualización, definición de características y tipos de emprendimiento social.
Resumen (en)
The literature on social entrepreneurship has gained importance. However, it remains fragmented in academia and to facilitate the development of a unified body a theoretical framework is necessary. This paper objective was to critically review the research on social entrepreneurship and evaluate which aspects are favorably addressed. For this purpose, 94 scientific articles available and distributed in different databases were analyzed: Scopus, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, Ebsco and Google Scholar published between 2000 and 2020. Approaching this research allowed us to verify the evolution of the topic of social entrepreneurship over the last few years. However, it should be noted that the findings show a limited subject. After the analysis, the conclusion shows the difficulty of defining the concept of social entrepreneurship, its characteristics and types of social entrepreneurship.
Resumen (pt)
A bibliografia sobre empreendedorismo social ganhou relevância. No entanto, ela permanece fragmentada no meio acadêmico e, para facilitar o desenvolvimento de um corpo unificado, precisa de uma estrutura teórica. O objetivo deste artigo foi rever criticamente a pesquisa sobre empreendedorismo social e avaliar quais aspectos são favoravelmente abordados. Para isso, foram analisados 94 artigos científicos disponíveis e distribuídos em diferentes bancos de dados: Scopus, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, Ebsco e Google Scholar publicados entre 2000 e 2020. Esta pesquisa permitiu verificar a evolução do tema do empreendedorismo social durante os últimos anos. Entretanto, deve ser observado que as conclusões mostram limitações sobre o assunto. Após a análise, a conclusão mostra a dificuldade de definir o conceito de empreendedorismo social, suas características e tipos de empreendedorismo social.
Referencias
Barki, E., Comini, G., Cunliffe, A., Hart, S. y Rai, S. (2015). Social entrepreneurship and social business: Retrospective and prospective research. RAE Revista de Administracao de Empresas, 55(4), 380-384. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-759020150402
Cagarman, K., Kratzer, J., von Arnim, L. H., Fajga, K. y Gieseke, M. J. (2020). Social entrepreneurship on its way to significance: The case of Germany. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(21), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12218954
Campigotto-Sandri, E., Caciatori-Junior, I., Chapaval-Pimentel, P. y Meira-Teixeira, R. (2020). Empreendedorismo social e inovação social: uma análise bibliométrica. Estudios Gerenciales, 511-524. https://doi.org/10.18046/j.estger.2020.157.3886
Choi, N. y Majumdar, S. (2014). Social entrepreneurship as an essentially contested concept: Opening a new avenue for systematic future research. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(3), 363-376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2013.05.001
Dees, G. (2007). Taking social entrepreneurship seriously. Society, 44(3), 24-31. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02819936
Dees, G. (2012). A tale of two cultures: Charity, problem solving, and the future of social entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Ethics, 111(3), 321-334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1412-5
Dees, G. J. y Anderson, B. (2004). Scaling Social Impact. Strategies for spreading social innovation. Review Stanford Social Innovation 1(4), 24-32. https://doi.org/10.48558/CNNZ-7276.
Dees, G. y Elías, J. (1998). Review: The challenges of combining social and commercial enterprise. Business Ethics Quarterly, 8(1), 165-178. https://doi.org/10.2307/3857527
Drayton, W. (2002). The citizen sector: Becoming as entrepreneurial and competitive as business. California Management Review, 44(3), 120-132. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166136
Drayton, W. (2006). Everyone a changemaker social entrepreneurship´s ultimate goal. Innovations, (1), 80-96. https://doi.org/10.1162/itgg.2006.1.1.80
Eck, N. J. van y Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibometric mapping. Scientometrics, (84), 523-538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
Guzmán, V. A. y Trujillo, M. A. (2008). Emprendimiento social-revisión de literatura. Revista Estudios Gerenciales, 24(109), 105-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0123-5923(08)70055-X
Harding, R. (2004). Social Enterprise: The new economic Engine? Business Strategy Review, 15(4), 40-43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0955-6419.2004.00338.x
Harding, R. (2007). Understanding Social Entrepreneurship. Industry and Higher Education, 21(1), 73-84. https://doi.org/10.5367/000000007780222723
Haugh, H. (2005). The role of social enterprise in regional development. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 2(4), 346-357. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJESB.2005.007085
Hojnik, B. B. y Crnogaj, K. (2020). Social impact, innovations, and market activity of social enterprises: Comparison of European countries. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12051915
Kingsley, M. y Thomas-Trout, M. (2020). Everyone a changemaker: Social entrepreneurship and its role in design. Design and Culture. The Journal of the Design Studies Forum, 13(2), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1080/17547075.2020.1794368
Light, P. C. (2006). Reshaping social entrepreneurship. Stanford Social Innovation Review. www.ssireview.org
Mair, J. y Martí, I. (2006). Social entrepreneurship research: A source of explanation, prediction, and delight. Journal of World Business, 41(1), 36-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2005.09.002
Martín, B. L. M. y Osberg, S. (2007). Social entrepreneurship: The case for definition. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 5(2). http://www.ssireview.org/articles/entry/social_entrepreneurship_the_case_for_definition
Martins, F. B. L. y Vier, H. M. (2013). Social entrepreneurship: A reflection for adopting public policies that support the third sector in Brazil. Journal of Technology Management and Innovation, (8), 188-196. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242013000300017
Méndez, M. T. P., Galindo, M. A. G. y Castaño, M. S. C. (2020). Effects of sociocultural and economic factors on social entrepreneurship and sustainable development. Journal of Innovation and Knowledge, 6(2), 69-77. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2444569X20300251
Newth, J. y Woods, C. (2014). Resistance to social entrepreneurship: How context shapes innovation. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 5(2), 192-213. https://doi.org/10.1080/19420676.2014.889739
Nicholls, A. (2010). The legitimacy of social entrepreneurship: Reflexive isomorphism in a pre-paradigmatic field. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(4), 611-633. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00397.x
Nicholls, A. y Dees, J. G. (2015). Social Innovation. En International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences: Second Edition (pp. 355-361). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.73105-9
Organización Internacional del Trabajo [OIT] y Programa De Las Naciones Unidas Para El Desarrollo [PNUD]. (2016). Promoción del emprendimiento y la innovación social juvenil en América Latina. https://www.undp.org/es/publications/promocion-del-emprendimiento-y-la-innovacion-social-juvenil-en-america-latina
Peredo, A. M. y McLean, M. (2006). Social entrepreneurship: A critical review of the concept. Journal of World Business, 41(1), 56-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2005.10.007
Prahalad, C. K. y Hammond, A. (2002). Serving the world’s poor, profitably. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2002/09/serving-the-worlds-poor-profitably?language=es
Roberts, D. y Woods, C. (2005). Changing the world on a shoestring: The concept of social entrepreneurship. Business Review, 45-51. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/242320433
Schaefer, K., Corner, P. D. y Kearins, K. (2015). Social, environmental, and sustainable entrepreneurship research: What is needed for sustainability-as-flourishing? Organization and Environment, 28(4), 394-413. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026615621111
Seelos, C. y Mair, J. (2004). Social entrepreneurship: The contribution of individual entrepreneurs to sustainable development. IESE Business School Working Paper, 553, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.701181
Shane, S. y Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Management Review, 25(1), 217-239. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2000.2791611
Sullivan, M. G. y Hume, M. (2009). Sustainability, social entrepreneurship, and social change. In Australasian Marketing Journal, 17(4), 189-191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ausmj.2009.06.008
Sullivan Mort, G., Weerawardena, J. y Carnegie, K. (2002). Social entrepreneurship: towards conceptualisation. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 8(1), 76-88. https://doi.org/10.1002/nvsm.202
Syrjä, P., Puumalainen, K., Sjögrén, H., Soininen, J. y Durst, S. (2019). Entrepreneurial orientation in firms with a social mission-a mixed-methods approach. Cogent Business & Management, 6(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2019.1602016
Tapsell, P., & Woods, C. (2010). Social entrepreneurship and innovation: Self-organization in an indigenous context. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 22(6), 535-556. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2010.488403
Vázquez, M. M. y Portales, L. (2014). La empresa social como detonadora de calidad de vida y desarrollo sustentable en comunidades rurales. Pensamiento y Gestión, (37), 255-284. https://doi.org/10.14482/pege.37.7028
Weerawardena, J., Salunke, S., Haigh, N. y Sullivan Mort, G. (2021a). Business model innovation in social purpose organizations: Conceptualizing dual social-economic value creation. Journal of Business Research, (125), 762-771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.10.016
Weerawardena, J. y Sullivan, M. G. (2006). Investigating social entrepreneurship: A multidimensional model. Journal of World Business, 41(1), 21-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2005.09.001
Yunus, M. (2009). Economic security for a World in crisis. World Policy Journal, Summer, 26(2), 5-12. https://doi.org/10.1162/wopj.2009.26.2.5
Yunus, M., Moingeon, B. y Lehmann-Ortega, L. (2010). Building social business models: Lessons from the grameen experience. Long Range Planning, 43(2-3), 308-325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2009.12.005
Cómo citar
Licencia
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Los autores mantienen los derechos sobre los artículos y por tanto son libres de compartir, copiar, distribuir, ejecutar y comunicar públicamente la obra bajo las condiciones siguientes:
Reconocer los créditos de la obra de la manera especificada por el autor o el licenciante (pero no de una manera que sugiera que tiene su apoyo o que apoyan el uso que hace de su obra).
SIGNOS está bajo una licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
La Universidad Santo Tomás conserva los derechos patrimoniales (copyright) de las obras publicadas, y favorece y permite la reutilización de las mismas bajo la licencia anteriormente mencionada.
