Publicado
2019-07-01

Transferencia de conocimiento como factor crítico para la gestión de la ciencia, la tecnología y la innovación en Maloka Bogotá, Colombia

Knowledge transfer as a critical factor for the management of science, technology and innovation in Maloka, Bogota Colombia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15332/25005421.5008
Carlos E. Blanco-Valbuena
Universidad Santo Tomás de Bogotá
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9490-7604
Wilmer Pineda
Universidad Santo Tomás
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7774-951X
PDF LIA

Resumen (es)

Objetivo. Evaluar las variables de cultura organizacional, las características del conocimiento tácito-explícito y las estrategias de transferencia interna de conocimiento, por incidir en la gestión de Maloka en relación con su fin: enriquecer la cultura ciudadana estableciendo lazos entre ciencia-tecnología- innovación y sociedad. Metodología. Buscando reducir dimensiones, se aplicó el análisis factorial como técnica estadística que define grupos de variables altamente correlacionados entre sí. Hemos utilizado el test de KMO (Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin) para saber si la técnica de reducción de dimensiones es viable. El estudio se ha hecho con una muestra de 72 directivos de niveles alto y medio de Maloka, corporación de gran visibilidad nacional e internacional. Resultados. Las variables de cultura organizacional evidencian la existencia  de gran confianza basada en valores morales y éticos; en las creencias colectivas; en las identidades de pensamiento surgidas de acontecimientos que conducen a la transferencia interna de conocimiento, y en los diálogos dirigidos a transferir los aprendizajes. La transferencia interna de conocimiento tácito se lleva a cabo a través de la observación directa a los expertos. El aprendizaje individual para la transferencia interna de conocimiento, se realiza a partir de estudiar lo escrito en las  “historias que se aprenden”. Las estrategias para transferir el conocimiento tácito se basan fundamentalmente en compartir experiencias por mentoría, entrenamiento,  redes y uso de un lenguaje común, verbal o corporal.

Palabras clave (es): transferencia de conocimiento, conocimiento tácito y explícito, cultura organizacional, gestión de conocimiento

Resumen (en)

Objective. Evaluate the variables of organizational culture, the characteristics of tacit-explicit knowledge and internal knowledge transfer strategies, for influencing the management of Maloka in relation to its purpose: enrich the culture of citizens by establishing links between science-technology-innovation and society. Methodology. In order to reduce dimensions, factor analysis was applied as a statistical technique that defines groups of highly correlated variables. We have used the KMO test (Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin) to know if the technique of reduction of dimensions is viable. The study has been done with a sample of 72 managers of high and medium levels of Maloka, a corporation of great national and international visibility. Results. The organizational culture variables show the existence of great confidence based on moral and ethical values; in collective beliefs; in the identities of thought arising from events that lead to the internal transfer of knowledge, and in dialogues aimed at transferring learning. The internal transfer of tacit knowledge is carried out through direct observation to the experts. Individual learning for the internal transfer of knowledge is done from studying what is written in the "stories that are learned". The strategies for transferring tacit knowledge are fundamentally based on sharing experiences through mentoring, training, networking and using a common language, verbal or corporal.
Palabras clave (en): knowledge transfer, TIC, educational institutions, school, research, research methodology, research instruments, pedagogy

Referencias

Abrams, L., Cross, R., Lesser, E. and Levin, D. (2003). Nurturing interpersonal trust in knowledge-sharing networks. Academy of Management Executive, 17 (4), 64-77.

Barney, J.B. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1). 99 -120.

Beijerse, R. (2000). Knowledge management in small and medium-sized companies. knowledge management for entrepreneurs. Journal of Knowledge Management, 4(2), 162-79.

Bender, S y Fish, A. (2000). The transfer of knowledge and the retention of expertise: the continuing need for global assignments. Journal of Knowledge Management, 4(2), 125-137.

Blanco-Valbuena, C.E. (2004). Impacto de la gestión del conocimiento en las empresas de los Parques tecnológicos Vascos. Universidad de Deusto, San Sebastián, País Vasco. Tesis doctoral.

Blanco- Valbuena, C.E y Peña-Legazkue, I. (2005), Activos Intangibles, acuerdos de colaboración y rendimiento en las empresas de alta tecnología del País Vasco. Cuadernos de Administración, 18 (30), 9-37. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana de Bogotá.

Blanco-Valbuena, C.E y Bernal, C (2018), Industrias Creativas y Culturales: Estudio desde el Enfoque de la Gestión del Conocimiento. Información Tecnológica, 29 (3), 15-28.

Canestrino, R. (2004). Cross-border knowledge transfer in international strategic alliances: from cultural variations to asymmetric learning process. Proceedings of I-KNOW ’04, 30 June-2 July, Graz.

Carlile, P. and Rebentisch, E. (2003). Into the black box: the knowledge transformation cycle. Management Science, 49, 1180-95.

Choi, C.J. and Lee, S.H. (1997). A knowledge-based view of cooperative inter-organizational relationships’’, in Beamish, P. and Killings, J. (Eds), Cooperative Strategies: European Perspectives, New Lexington Press, San Francisco, CA, 33-58.

Christensen, P.H. (2003). Knowledge Sharing – Time Sensitiveness and Push-pull Strategies in a Non-hyper- organization. EGOS Colloquium, Copenhagen Business School, Copenhagen.

Casson, M. (1997). Information and Organization: A New Perspective on the Theory of the Firm, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

Daft, R.L. y Lengel, R.H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32(5), 554-71.

Davenport, T.H. y Prusak, L. (1998). Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.

Dawson, R., 2000. Knowledge Capabilities as the Focus of Organizational Development and Strategy. Journal of Knowledge Management, vol. 4, Nº 4, pp. 320-327.

Disterer, G. (2003). Fostering knowledge sharing: why and how?’’, in Reis, A. and Isaias, P. (Eds), Proceedings of the IADIS International Conference e-Society 2003, Lisbon, 219-26.

Fahey, L. and Prusak, L. (1998). The 11 deadliest sins of knowledge management’’. California Management Review, 40(3), 265-76.

Fong, Nguyen y Yun Xu. (2013). Knowledge transfer across dissimilar cultures. Journal Knowledge Management, 17 (1), 29-46.

Garvin, D.A. (1993). Building a learning organisation''. Harvard Business Review, July-August, 78-91.

Garud, R. (1997). On the distinction between know-how, know-what, and know-why’’, in Huff, A. and Walsh, J. (Eds), Advances in Strategic Management, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT.

Goh,S.C. (2002). Managing effective knowledge transfer: an integrative framework and some practice implications. Journal Knowledge Management, 6(1), 23-30.

Grant RM. (1996). Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm. Strategic Management Journal Winter Special Issue 17,109-122.

Greengard, S. (1998a). Storing, shaping and sharing collective wisdom. Workforce, 77(10), 82-85.

Gururajan y Fink. (2010). Attitudes towards knowledge transfer in an environment to perform. Journal of Knowledge Management, 14 (6), 828-840.

Haldin-Herrgard, T. (2000). Difficulties in diffusion of tacit knowledge in organisations’’, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 1(4), 357-65.

Hitt MA et al. (2001b). Direct and Moderating Effects of Human Capital on Strategy and Performance in Professional Service Firms: A Resource-Based Perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 449-467.

House, R.J, Hanges, P.J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P.W. y Gupta, V. (Eds). (2004). Culture, Leadership, and Organizations. The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.

Inkpen, A. C. (2000). Learning through joint ventures: A framework of knowledge acquisition. Journal of Management Studies, 37 (7), 1019-1043.

Inkpen, A.C. y Tsang, E.W.K. (2005). Social capital, networks, and knowledge transfer. Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 146-165.

Jobson, J. D. (2012). Applied multivariate data analysis: volume II: Categorical and Multivariate Methods. Springer Science & Business Media.

Kogut, B. and Zander, U. (992). Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3(3), 383-97.

Kogut, B. and Zander, U. (1993).Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation. Journal of International Business Studies, 24(4), 625-46.

Kumar y Ganesh. (2009). Research on knowledge transfer in organizations: a morphology”. Journal of knowledge management, 13(4), 161-174.

Leonard, D. and Sensiper, S. (1998).The role of tacit knowledge in group innovation’’. California Management Review, 40(3), 112-32

Liyanage, C; Elhag, T, Ballal,T; y Li, Q. (2009).Knowledge communication and translation – a knowledge transfer model. Journal of Knowledge Management, 13(3), 118-131.

Lubit, R. (2001). Tacit knowledge and knowledge management: the keys sustainable competitive advantage. Organizational Dynamics, 29(3),164-78.

Marshall, C., Prusak, L. and Shpilberg, D. (1996).Financial risk and the need for superior knowledge management''. California Management Review, 38(3), 77-101

Matsuo, M. (2015). Human resource development programs for knowledge transfer and creation: the case of the Toyota Technical Development Corporation”. Journal of Knowledge Management, 19(6), 1186-1203.

Mazloomi Khamseh y R. Jolly. (2008). Knowledge transfer in alliances: determinant factors. Journal of Knowledge Management, 12(1), 37-50.

McFadyen, M.A., Semadeni, M. y Cannella, A.A. (2009). Value of strong ties to disconnected others: examining knowledge creation in biomedicine. Organization Science, 20(3), 552-564.

Nissen, M., Kamel, M. and Sengupta, K. (2000). Integrated analysis and design of knowledge systems and processes. Information Resources Management Journal, 13(1), 24-43.

Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14-37.

Nonaka, Ichijo y Von Krogh. (2000). Enabling Knowledge Creation. Oxford University Press, Inc.

Penrose, E.T. (1959). The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. John Wiley, New York.

Polanyi, M. (1966).the Tacit Dimension. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

Polanyi, M. (1967). The Tacit Dimension, Doubleday, London.

Posada et al. (2010). Deslocalizando la Apropiación Social de la Ciencia y la Tecnología en Colombia: Aportes desde prácticas diversas. Departamento Administrativo de Colciencias, Bogotá.

Roberts, J. (2000). From know-how to show-how? Questioning the role of information and communication technologies in knowledge transfer’’. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 12 (4), 429-43.

Sáenz, Aramburu y Blanco. (2012). Knowledge Sharing and innovation in Spanish and Colombian high-tech firms. Journal Knowledge Management, 6 (6), 919-933.

Seaton, R.A.F. (2002). Knowledge Transfer, Strategic Tools to Support Adaptive, Integrated Water Resource Management Under Changing Conditions at Catchment Scale – A Co-evolutionary Approach, Bedford.

Seashore, S. E., y Yuchtman, E. (1967). Factorial analysis of organizational performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 377-395.

Senker, J. and Faulkner, W. (1996), ‘‘Networks, tacit knowledge and innovation’’, in Coombs, R., Richards, A., Saviotti, P. and Walsh, V. (Eds. Technological Collaboration, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 76-97.

Spender J-C. (1996). Making Knowledge the Basis of a Dynamic Theory of the Firm. Strategic Management Journal Winter Special Issue 17, 45-62.

Szulanski, G. (1996).Exploring internal stickiness: impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm’’, Strategic Management Journal, 17, 27-43.

Teece, D.J., Pisano, G. y Shuen, A.(1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-33.

Thompson, B. (2004). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Understanding concepts and applications. American Psychological Association.

Tsoukas, H. (1996).The firm as a distributed knowledge system: a constructivist approach’’. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 11-25.

Tsai, W. and Ghoshal, S. (1998).Social capital and value creation: the role of intrafirm networks’’. Academy of Management Journal, 41 (4), 464-76.

Van den Hooff, B. y De Ridder, J.A., 2004. Knowledge sharing in context - the influence of organisational commitment, communication climate and CMC use on knowledge sharing. Journal of Knowledge Management, 8(6), 117-30.

Wernerfelt B.1984. A Resource-Based View of the Firm. Strategic Management Journal 5(2), 171-180.

Zander, U. and Kogut, B. (1995).Knowledge and the speed of transfer and imitation of organizational capabilities: an empirical test’’. Organization Science, 6, 76-92.

Zahra, S.A. and George, G. (2002), ‘‘Absorptive capacity – a review, reconceptualisation and extension’’. Academy of Management Review, Vol. 27 No. 2, pp. 185-203.

Zhou, Siu y Wang., 2010. Effects of social tie content on knowledge transfer. Journal of Knowledge Management. 14(3), 449-463.

Dimensions

PlumX

Visitas

702

Descargas

Los datos de descarga aún no están disponibles.

Cómo citar

Blanco-Valbuena, C. E., & Pineda, W. (2019). Transferencia de conocimiento como factor crítico para la gestión de la ciencia, la tecnología y la innovación en Maloka Bogotá, Colombia. Revista Interamericana De Investigación Educación Y Pedagogía RIIEP, 12(2), 41-70. https://doi.org/10.15332/25005421.5008

Licencia

Los autores mantienen los derechos sobre los artículos y por tanto  son libres de compartir, copiar, distribuir, ejecutar y comunicar públicamente la obra bajo las condiciones siguientes:

Reconocer los créditos de la obra de la manera especificada por el autor o el licenciante (pero no de una manera que sugiera que tiene su apoyo o que apoyan el uso que hace de su obra).

RIIEP está bajo una licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)

La Universidad Santo Tomás conserva los derechos patrimoniales de las obras publicadas, y favorece y permite la reutilización de las mismas bajo la licencia anteriormente mencionada.