«Datificación» y Educación Superior: Hacia la construcción de un marco para la alfabetización en datos del profesorado universitario
Resumen (es)
La «datificación» de procesos y servicios es un fenómeno emergente, que está creando una nueva forma de divisoria digital (Kitchin, 2014). La abundancia de datos generados y disponibles a partir del uso aplicativos web y móviles requiere competencias específicas para su explotación; además, han surgido nuevas preocupaciones, como la vigilancia y la incapacidad de comprender el poder y el control detrás del seguimiento de datos y las características de los algoritmos aplicados para el uso de dichos datos (Kennedy, Poell y van Dijck, 2015). La alfabetización en datos (Data Literacy) en general y de los educadores en particular serían un medio para lograr la apropiación activa y crítica de la riqueza provista por los datos, frenando inclusive las aristas más negativas del fenómeno (Dunlap y Piro, 2016; Markham, 2018 y Raffaghelli, 2017a y 2018a). Este artículo tiene como objetivo introducir un marco conceptual que apoye la alfabetización en datos del profesorado universitario, para capacitarlos en relación al fenómeno de la sociedad «datificada». El estudio se basa en una revisión de la literatura y es parte de una etapa inicial de un proyecto de investigación más amplio. Los marcos de alfabetización en datos, incluido el marco europeo DigCompEdu (Redecker y Punie, 2017) que ha sido adoptado para orientar la formación a la competencia digital de los educadores e incluye la alfabetización en datos, se analizan y discuten, con el objetivo de crear una síntesis de los componentes básicos y sus implicaciones para la investigación y la práctica.
Referencias
Atenas, J., Havemann, L. y Priego, E. (2015). Open Data as Open Educational Resources: Towards Transversal Skills and Global Citizenship. Open Praxis, 7(4), 377–389. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.7.4.233
Boyer, E. L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: priorities of the professoriate (Vol. 1997). San Francisco, CA: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
Carlson, J., Fosmire, M., Miller, C. C. y Nelson, M. S. (2011). Determining Data Information Literacy Needs: A Study of Students and Research Faculty. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 11(2), 629–657. https://doi. org/10.1353/pla.2011.0022
Constantino, G. D. y Raffaghelli, J. E. (2016). Perspectives on Digital Scholarship: In A. Esposito (Ed.), Research 2.0 and the Impact of Digital Technologies on Scholarly Inquiry (pp. 69–96). IGI Global. https://doi. org/10.4018/978-1-5225-0830-4.ch005
Constantino, G. D., Raffaghelli, J. E. y Teijeiro, M. del C. (2015). Profesión Académica Digital (Digital Scholarship): transformaciones del trabajo académico en clave de redes sociales. In Virtual Educa 2015 (pp. 1–15). Acceso en: http://www.virtualeduca.pro/documentos/23/Ponencia- Constantino, Raffaghelli y Teijeiro VIRTUAL EDUCA 2015 v.f..pdf
Daniel, B. (2015). Big Data and analytics in higher education: Opportunities and challenges. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(5), 904–920. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12230
Daniel, B. K. (2017). Big Data in Higher Education: The Big Picture. In Big Data and Learning Analytics in Higher Education (pp. 19–28). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319- 06520-5_3
Dunlap, K. y Piro, J. S. (2016). Diving into data: Developing the capacity for data literacy in teacher education. Cogent Education, 3(1). https:// doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2015.1132526
EMC Education Services. (2015). Data Science y Big Data Analytics. Indianapolis, IN, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi. org/10.1002/9781119183686
European Commission. (2007). Key Competences for Lifelong Learning. European Reference Framework. Luxemburg. Acceso en: http:// ec.europa.eu/dgs/education_culture/publ/pdf/ll-learning/keycomp_ en.pdf
Ferguson, R. (2012). Learning analytics: drivers, developments and challenges. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 4(5/6), 304–317. Acceso en: http://oro.open.ac.uk/36374/1/ IJTEL40501_Ferguson Jan 2013.pdf
Goodfellow, R. (2014). Scholarly, digital, open: an impossible triangle? Research in Learning Technology, 21. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt. v21.21366
Hey, A. J. G. (2009). The fourth paradigm : data-intensive scientific discovery. Microsoft Research.
Kennedy, H., Poell, T. y van Dijck, J. (2015). Data and agency. Big Data & Society, 2(2), 205395171562156. https://doi. org/10.1177/2053951715621569
Kitchin, R. (2014). Big Data, new epistemologies and paradigm shifts. Big Data & Society, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951714528481
Kitchin, R. (2015). The Data Revolotion: Big Data, Open Data, Data Infrastructures and Their Consequences (Vol. 1). London: Sage. https:// doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Knight, S., Buckingham Shum, S. y Littleton, K. (2014). Epistemology, Assessment, Pedagogy: Where Learning Meets Analytics in the Middle. Journal of Learning Analytics, 1(2), 23–47. Li, J., Greenhow, C. y Askari, E. (2016). Scholars in the Digital Age. In Research 2.0 and the Impact of Digital Technologies on Scholarly Inquiry (Vol. 36, pp. 1–16). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-0830-4.ch001
Lupton, M. y Bruce, C. S. (2010). Windows on information literacy worlds: Generic, situated and transformative perspectives. In A. Lloyd y S. Talja (Eds.), Practicing information literacy: Bringing theories of learning, practice and information literacy together (pp. 4–27). Wagga-Wagga: Centre for Information Studies, Charles Sturt University.
Manca, S., Caviglione, L. y Raffaghelli, J. E. (2016). Big data for social media learning analytics: potentials and challenges. Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 12(2). 27-39.
Manca, S. y Ranieri, M. (2017). Exploring Digital Scholarship. A Study on Use of Social Media for Scholarly Communication among Italian Academics. In A. Esposito (Ed.), Research 2.0 and the Impact of Digital Technologies on Scholarly Inquiry (pp. 117–142). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-0830-4.ch007
Mandinach, E. B. (2012). A Perfect Time for Data Use: Using Data-Driven Decision Making to Inform Practice. Educational Psychologist, 47(2), 71– 85. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2012.667064
Mandinach, E. B. y Gummer, E. S. (2016). What does it mean for teachers to be data literate: Laying out the skills, knowledge, and dispositions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 60, 366–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. tate.2016.07.011
Markham, A. N. (2018). Critical Pedagogy as a Response to Datafication. Qualitative Inquiry, 107780041880947. https://doi. org/10.1177/1077800418809470
Maybee, C. y Zilinski, L. (2015). Data informed learning: A next phase data literacy framework for higher education. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 52(1), 1–4. https:// doi.org/10.1002/pra2.2015.1450520100108
Nunn, S., Avella, J. T., Kanai, T. y Kebritchi, M. (2016). Learning Analytics Methods, Benefits, and Challenges in Higher Education: A Systematic Literature Review. Online Learning, 20(2). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj. v20i2.790
O’Neil, C. (2016). Weapons of math destruction : how big data increases inequality and threatens democracy. New York: Penguin.
Owen, R., Macnaghten, P. y Stilgoe, J. (2012). Responsible research and innovation: From science in society to science for society, with society. Science and Public Policy, 39(6), 751–760. https://doi.org/10.1093/ scipol/scs093
Pangrazio, L. y Selwyn, N. (2018). ‘Personal data literacies’: A critical literacies approach to enhancing understandings of personal digital data. New Media y Society, early view. https://doi. org/10.1177/1461444818799523
Pearce, N., Weller, M., Scanlon, E. y Kinsley, S. (2010, December 12). Digital Scholarship Considered: How New Technologies Could Transform Academic Work. In Education. Retrieved from http://ineducation.ca/ ineducation/article/view/44/508
Perrotta, C. y Williamson, B. (2018). The social life of Learning Analytics: cluster analysis and the ‘performance’ of algorithmic education. Learning, Media and Technology, 43(1), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1080 /17439884.2016.1182927
Persico, D. y Pozzi, F. (2015). Informing learning design with learning analytics to improve teacher inquiry. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(2), 230–248. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12207
Prinsloo, P. y Slade, S. (2017). An elephant in the learning analytics room. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Learning Analytics & Knowledge Conference on - LAK ’17 (pp. 46–55). New York, New York, USA: ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/3027385.3027406
Raffaghelli, J. E. (2017a). Alfabetizzare ai dati nella società dei big e open data: una sfida formativa. Formazione&Insegnamento - European Journal of Research on Education and Teaching, 25(3), 279–304. https:// doi.org/107346/-fei-XV-03-17_21
Raffaghelli, J. E. (2017b). Exploring the (missed) connections between digital scholarship and faculty development: a conceptual analysis. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0058-x
Raffaghelli, J. E. (2018a). Educators’ Data Literacy Supporting critical perspectives in the context of a “datafied” education. In M. Ranieri, L. Menichetti y M. Kashny-Borges (Eds.), Teacher education & training on ict between Europe and Latin America (pp. 91–109). Roma: Aracné. https://doi.org/10.4399/97888255210238
Raffaghelli, J. E. (2018b). Oltre il “far di conto” nell’era digitale. La frontiera della data literacy. In M. Ranieri (Ed.), Teoria e pratica delle new media literacies (pp. 99–133). Milano: Aracné. https://doi. org/10.4399/97888548940444
Raffaghelli, J. E., Cucchiara, S., Manganello, F. y Persico, D. (2016). Different views on Digital Scholarship: separate worlds or cohesive research field? Research in Learning Technology, 24(0), 1–17. https:// doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v24.32036
Raffaghelli, J. E. y Manca, S. (2019). Is There a Social Life in Open Data? The Case of Open Data Practices in Educational Technology Research. Publications 2019, Vol. 7, Page 9, 7(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/ PUBLICATIONS7010009
Redecker, C. y Punie, Y. (2017). European Framework for the Digital Competence of Educators: DigCompEdu. Joint Research Centre (JRC) Science for Policy report. https://doi.org/10.2760/159770
Ridsdale, C., Rothwell, J., Smit, M., Ali-Hassan, H., Bliemel, M., Irvine, D., … Wuetherick, B. (2015). Strategies and Best Practices for Data Literacy Education. https://doi.org/ 10.13140/RG.2.1.1922.5044
Roll, I. y Winne, P. H. (2015). Understanding, evaluating, and supporting self-regulated learning using learning analytics. Journal of Learning Analytics, 2(1), 7–12. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2015.21.2
Scott, A. (2014). Open data for economic growth. 1–20 Washington: World Bank.
Slade, S. y Prinsloo, P. (2013). Learning Analytics, Ethical Issues and Dilemmas. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(10), 1510–1529. https:// doi.org/10.1177/0002764213479366
Slavin, R. E. (2002). Evidence-Based Education Policies: Transforming Educational Practice and Research. Educational Researcher, 31(7), 15– 21. https://doi.org/10.2307/3594400
Snow, C. (1964). Le due culture (trad. it di). Milano: Feltrinelli.
Stephenson, E. y Schifter Caravello, P. (2007). Incorporating data literacy into undergraduate information literacy programs in the social sciences. Reference Services Review, 35(4), 525–540. https://doi. org/10.1108/00907320710838354
Stewart, B. (2015). Scholarship in Abundance: Influence, Engagement, and Attention in Scholarly Networks. https://doi.org/10.1017/ CBO9781107415324.004
Stewart, B. E. (2013). Massiveness + Openness = New Literacies of Participation? Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 9(2), 228–238. Acceso en: http://jolt.merlot.org/vol9no2/stewart_bonnie_0613.htm
Stewart, B. E. (2015). Open to influence: what counts as academic influence in scholarly networked Twitter participation. Learning, Media and Technology, 40(3), 287–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.20 15.1015547
Veletsianos, G. (2013). Open practices and identity: Evidence from researchers and educators’ social media participation. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(4), 639–651. https://doi.org/10.1111/ bjet.12052
Veletsianos, G. y Kimmons, R. (2012). Networked Participatory Scholarship: Emergent techno-cultural pressures toward open and digital scholarship in online networks. Computers & Education, 58(2), 766–774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.001
Veletsianos, G. y Stewart, B. E. (2016). Discreet Openness: Scholars Selective and Intentional Self-Disclosures Online. Social Media + Society, 2(3), 2056305116664222. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305116664222
Vuorikari, R., Ferguson, R., Brasher, A., Clow, D., Cooper, A., Hillaire, G., … Rienties, B. (2016). Research Evidence on the Use of Learning Analytics. Brussels> Joint Research Center. Acceso en: https://doi. org/10.2791/955210
Wasson, B., Hansen, C. y Netteland, G. (2016). Data Literacy and Use for Learning when using Learning Analytics for Learners. In S. Bull, B. M. Ginon, J. Kay, M. D. Kickmeier-Rust y M. D. Johnson (Eds.), Learning Analytics for Learners, 2016 workshops at LAK (pp. 38–41). Edimburg: CEUR. Acceso en http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1596/paper6.pdf
Williamson, B. (2018). The hidden architecture of higher education: building a big data infrastructure for the ‘smarter university.’ International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-018-0094-1
Zee, T., van der y Reich, J. (2018). Open Education Science. AERA Open, 4(3), 233285841878746. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858418787466
Cómo citar
Licencia
Los autores mantienen los derechos sobre los artículos y por tanto son libres de compartir, copiar, distribuir, ejecutar y comunicar públicamente la obra bajo las condiciones siguientes:
Reconocer los créditos de la obra de la manera especificada por el autor o el licenciante (pero no de una manera que sugiera que tiene su apoyo o que apoyan el uso que hace de su obra).
RIIEP está bajo una licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
La Universidad Santo Tomás conserva los derechos patrimoniales de las obras publicadas, y favorece y permite la reutilización de las mismas bajo la licencia anteriormente mencionada.
