Sobre el binomio libertad y seguridad en el derecho
On the binomial liberty and security in law
Abstract (en)
This paper examines the complex relationship between two key pieces of the ruleof law, freedom and security. Examines, in particular, the current influence of the
expanded concept of security on the fundamental right to personal freedom from
the idea that the future might hold completely risk scenarios and new dangers.
This concept of security points, so the reaction to the targeted phenomena and,
ultimately, that purpose also involves the reconfiguration of state tasks and aims, in
turn, to a new conception of the state with a clear impact on the idea of freedom
and therefore the rule of law itself.
For all analyzes, first, the content constitutionally declared the right to freedom
and security in the Spanish legal system and to highlight, ultimately, freedom
and security, while you goods closely interwoven enroll in the legal order whose
effectiveness is mission of the State. What refers to the traditional relationship
between freedom and common good, the Greek koinon goes to Rome as bonum
commune. Of followed, addresses, just as the freedom-security binomial linked
to the common good. Well, not chance, just enough politically, expressed in Law
(Law), produces freedom in safety due to homonoia or consensus on the basic aspects of coexistence. Hence the indivisibility of freedom and security. Then, as
indicated above, it delves into the origin and development of current risks affecting
the traditional relationship between freedom and liberty. As proof of the above, it
ends with the exhibition of its application to a particular field: urbanism. Well, in
fact, the current situation and the risks involved can be illustrated by its light while
spatial expression of society, the political and economic-social system.
Abstract (es)
References
Baruzzi, A. (1990). Freiheit, Recht und Gemeinwohl. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
Beck, U. (1998). La sociedad del riesgo. Hacia una nueva modernidad. España: Paidós Ibérica.
_______. (2006a). La sociedad del riesgo global. España: Siglo XXI Editores
_______. (2006b). La sociedad del riesgo: hacia una nueva Modernidad. España: Ediciones Paidós Ibérica.
_______. (2008). La sociedad del riesgo mundial: en busca de la seguridad perdida. España: Ediciones Paidós Ibérica.
Böckenförde, E. W. (1976). Staat, Gesellschaft, Freiheit. Studien zur Staatstheorie und zum Verfassungsrecht. Frankfurt: Ed. Suhrkamp.
Casino Rubio, M. (2015). Seguridad pública y Constitución. Madrid: Instituto García Oviedo-Tecnos.
Denninger, E. (2005). Recht in globaler Unordnung. Berliner: Ed. BWV.
García Morillo, J. (1995). El derecho a la libertad personal. Valencia: Ed. Tirant Lo Blanch.
Lichtenberger, E. (2002). Die Stadt. Von der Polis zur Metropolis. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
Parejo Alfonso, L. (2008). Seguridad y policía de seguridad. Valencia: Ed. Tirant Lo Blanch.
Pérez Luño, A. E. (1990). Seguridad jurídica y sistema cautelar. Alicante: Biblioteca virtual Miguel de Cervantes.
Pico della Mirandola, G. (2004 [1486]). Discurso sobre la dignidad del hombre (Traducción A. Ruiz Díaz). México: UNAM.
Pico della Mirandola, G. (2010). Relato el Génesos. Discurso sobre la dignidad del hombre Revista Digital Universitaria, 11(11). Recuperado de http://www.revista.unam.mx/vol.11/num11/art102/art102.pdf
Ponce Solé, J. (1999). Segregación espacial, derecho urbanístico y jueces audaces en los Estados Unidos de América (Con algunas reflexiones sobre el Derecho español). Revista Española de Derecho Constitucional, 19(57), 329-354.
Ponce Solé, J. (2001). Derecho urbanístico y segregación espacial. Ciudad y territorio: Estudios territoriales, 130, 667-686.
How to Cite
License
IUSTA Journal is under license Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)