El problema de decir de una cosa que es una obra de arte
The Problem of Saying Something is a Work of Art
Abstract (en)
This paperfocuses on the defining frameworks of one ofthe mostimportant problems ofthe artphilosophy:the ontology ofthe artwork.We considerthat a prerequisite to attemptsto raise an answer to the problem isto give clarity to the philosophical problem.To this extent,the text presentsitsrootsin the traditions of Kant and Hegel and then discusses some of the answers that contemporary philosophers have raised about the issue. The debate shows that it is possible to establish the outline of the problem of the ontology of the artwork between at least two limits, sensation and meaning. However, thequestionsremains aboutwhetherto holdthe aforementioneddichotomy is yet a plausible strategy.Abstract (es)
Este artículo se centra en los marcos de definición de uno de los problemas más importantes de la filosofía del arte: la ontología de la obra de arte. Considera que un paso previo al de plantear respuestas tentativas es otorgar claridad al problema filosófico. En esta medida, presenta las raíces del problema en las tradiciones kantiana y hegeliana, y posteriormente discute algunas de las respuestas que filósofos contemporáneos han propuesto sobre el asunto. El debate muestra que es posible establecer el marco de definición del problema de la ontología de la obra de arte entre al menos dos límites, el de la sensación y el del significado. Sin embargo, queda la pregunta de si sostener la mencionada dicotomía es aun una estrategia plausible.
References
Allison,H.(2001).Kant’s theory of taste.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Danto, A. (2002). La transfiguración del lugar común. Barcelona: Paidós.
Domínguez, J. (2008). Cultura y arte: una correspondencia en proceso. En Jorge Aurelio Díaz (ed.) La nostalgia del absoluto: pensar a Hegel hoy. Bogotá: UNAL.
Dufrenne, M. (2001). The World of the aesthetic object. En Clive Cazeau (ed.). The continental aesthetics reader. New York: Routledge.
Gadamer, H.G. (2001). Verdad y método. Salamanca: Sígueme.
Hegel, G.W.F. (1983). Estética. Tomo 1. Buenos Aires: Siglo XX.
Johnson, M. (1978). Kant’s unified theory oftaste. En Journal of aesthetics and art criticism, Vol. 38, No. 2, (winter), pp. 167-178.
Kant, E. (1999). Crítica del juicio. Madrid: Espasa Calpe.
Lyotard, J.F. (1999). Lo inhumano. Buenos Aires: Manantial.
Margolis, J. (1998). Farewell to Danto and Goodman. En British Journal of Aesthetics; Oct, Vol. 38, No. 4, pp. 353-374.
Thomasson, A. (2004).The ontology of art. En Peter Kivy (ed.). Blackwell guide to aesthetics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Tilghman, B. (2006). Danto and the ontology of literature. En Reflections on aesthetic judgment and other essays. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.
How to Cite
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
