Validación de un instrumento que relacione las dimensiones competenciales del DigCompEdu con las prácticas educativas de docentes
Validation of an Instrument Linking the Competence Dimensions of DigCompEdu with Teachers’ Educational Practices
Validação de um Instrumento que Relacione as Dimensões de Competência do DigCompEdu com as Práticas Educativas de Docentes
Abstract (en)
The digital transformation of education is a phenomenon that is changing the way people learn and teach. Higher education teachers are increasingly utilizing digital technologies to support teaching and learning activities, as well as evaluation, which has led to a growing interest in developing digital competencies. However, the measurement of these competencies through standardized instruments, such as DigCompEdu, raises concerns about the self-perception of teachers at the time of assessing all the competency areas. Following its application in the faculty of education of the Corporación Universitaria Minuto de Dios in the year 2021, it was found that 77 % were placed in the high category, and the objective was established to validate an instrument that allows relating the competency dimensions of the DigCompEdu with the educational practices of the teachers of the Corporación Universitaria Minuto de Dios , main office. The research was characterized by a mixed approach and the development of the Delphi methodology; likewise, it had a non-experimental design and an exploratory scope. The results show that the validation aspects of pertinence, coherence, relevance, sufficiency, and clarity reached maximum scores by the experts. It is concluded that in three rounds of consultation with the Delphi methodology, with a total of 13 experts, a consensus has been reached on the high quality and usefulness of the information provided, confirming the soundness and value of the information for the target audience. Cronbach's alpha coefficient is applied to obtain the reliability index, which is 0.91.
Abstract (es)
La transformación digital de la educación es un fenómeno que está cambiando la forma en que se aprende y se enseña. Los docentes en educación superior cada vez usan más tecnologías digitales como apoyo a las actividades de enseñanza-aprendizaje y a la evaluación, lo que ha conllevado un creciente interés por el desarrollo de competencias digitales. No obstante, la medición de estas competencias a través de instrumentos estandarizados como el DigCompEdu dejan inquietudes frente a la autopercepción de los docentes al momento de dimensionar todas las áreas competenciales del mismo. Por esta razón , cuando se aplicó en la facultad de educación de la Corporación Universitaria Minuto de Dios en el año 2021, y se encontró que un 77 % se ubicaban en categoría alta, se estableció el objetivo de validar un instrumento que permita relacionar las dimensiones competenciales del DigCompEdu con las prácticas educativas de los docentes de la Corporación Universitaria Minuto de Dios (Uniminuto), sede principal. La investigación se caracterizó por el enfoque mixto y el desarrollo de la metodología Delphi; asimismo, tuvo un diseño no experimental y un alcance exploratorio. Los resultados evidencian que los aspectos de validación en torno a pertinencia, coherencia, relevancia, suficiencia y claridad alcanzaron puntuaciones máximas por parte de los expertos. Se concluye que en tres rondas de consulta de la metodología Delphi, con un total de 13 expertos, se ha alcanzado un consenso sobre la alta calidad y utilidad de la información proporcionada, confirmando la solidez y el valor de la información para el público objetivo. Se aplica el coeficiente alfa de Cronbach, para la obtención del índice de fiabilidad el cual es de 0,91.
Abstract (pt)
A transformação digital da educação é um fenômeno que está mudando a forma como o ensino e a aprendizagem ocorrem. Os professores do ensino superior estão usando cada vez mais tecnologias digitais para apoiar as atividades de ensino-aprendizagem e avaliação, o que levou a um interesse crescente no desenvolvimento de competências digitais. No entanto, a medição dessas competências por meio de instrumentos padronizados, como o DigCompEdu, levanta preocupações sobre a autopercepção dos professores quando se trata de avaliar todas as áreas de competência. Por esse motivo, e uma vez aplicado na Faculdade de Educação da Corporación Universitaria Minuto de Dios no ano de 2021, constatou-se que 77% foram colocados na categoria alta, foi estabelecido um objetivo de validar um instrumento que permita relacionar as dimensões de competência do DigCompEdu com as práticas educacionais dos professores da Corporación Universitaria Minuto de Dios, campus principal. A pesquisa caracterizou-se pelo enfoque misto e pelo desenvolvimento da metodologia Delphi; além disso, teve um desenho não experimental e um escopo exploratório. Os resultados mostram que os aspectos de validação de relevância, coerência, coerência, relevância, suficiência e clareza alcançaram pontuação máxima pelos especialistas. Conclui-sé que, em três rodadas de consulta da metodologia Delphi, com um total de 13 especialistas, chegou-se a um consenso sobre a alta qualidade e a utilidade das informações fornecidas, confirmando a solidez e o valor das informações para o público-alvo. O coeficiente alfa de Cronbach é aplicado para obter o índice de confiabilidade, que é de 0,91.
References
Adell, J., & Castañeda, A. (2012). Tecnologías emergentes, ¿pedagogías emergentes? En J. Hernández, M. Pennesi, D. Sobrino y A. Vásquez (coord.). Tendencias emergentes en educación con TIC. Barcelona: Asociación Espiral, Educación y Tecnología. Págs. 13-32. ISBN: 978-84-616-0448-7
Agreda-Montoro, M., Hinojo-Lucena, M., & Sola-Reche, J. (2016). Diseño y validación de un instrumento para evaluar la competencia digital de los docentes en la Educación Superior española. Revista de Medios y Educación, 49, 39-56. https://doi.org/10.12795/pixelbit.2016.i49.03
Ala-Mutka, K. (2011). Mapping digital competence: Towards a conceptual understanding. European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Prospective Technological Studies. https://www.academia.edu/42521335/Mapping_Digital_Competence_Towards_a_Conceptual_Understanding
Anderson, C., & Anderson, K. (2019). Differentiation through technology. In M. Graves & M. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Differentiated instructional strategies in practice: Train-the-trainer professional development program, 161-189.
Bates, A. (2015). Teaching in a digital age: Guidelines for designing teaching and learning for a digital age. Tony Bates Associates Ltd.
Betancur-Chicué, V., Gómez-Ardila, S. E., Cárdenas-Rodríguez, Y. P., Hernández-Gómez, S. A., Galindo-Cuesta, J. A., & Cadrazco-Suárez, M. A. (2023). Instrumento para la identificación de competencias digitales docentes: Validación de un instrumento basado en el DigCompEdu en la Universidad de la Salle, Colombia. Revista Prisma Social, 41, Article 41.
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2018). Classroom assessment and pedagogy. In N. Webb & K. Gomez (Eds.). The SAGE Encyclopedia of Educational Research, Measurement, and Evaluation (pp. 309-313). SAGE Publications.
Blumenfeld, P., Soloway, E., Marx, R., Krajcik, J., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. (2020). Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist, 27(3), 425-447.
Cabero-Almenara, J., & Palacios-Rodríguez, A. (2020). Marco Europeo de Competencia Digital Docente «DigCompEdu» y cuestionario «DigCompEdu Check-In». EDMETIC. Revista de Educación Mediática y TIC, 9(1), 213-234. https://doi.org/10.21071/edmetic.v9i1.12462
Comisión Europea. (2006). Recomendación del Parlamento Europeo y del Consejo, de 18 de diciembre de 2006, sobre las competencias clave para el aprendizaje permanente. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reco/2006/962/oj/spa
Escobar-Pérez, J., & Cuervo-Martínez, Á. (2008). Validez de contenido y juicio de expertos: Una aproximación a su utilización. Avances en Medición, 6, 27-36.
Friesen, N., & Lowe, S. (2012). The questionable promise of social media for education: Connective learning and the commercial imperative. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28(3), 183-194.
García-Ruiz, M. E., & Lena-Acebo, F. J. (2018). Aplicación del método Delphi en el diseño de una investigación cuantitativa sobre el fenómeno FABLAB. Empiria. Revista de metodología de ciencias sociales, 40, 129. https://doi.org/10.5944/empiria.40.2018.22014
García-Valcárcel, A., & Tejada, C. (2021). El docente como facilitador del aprendizaje en entornos virtuales. Pixel-Bit: Revista de Medios y Educación, (58), 195-210.
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2019). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112.
ISTE. (2007). ISTE Standards For Educators. https://iste.org/standards/educators
Koltay, T. (2017). Fake news is not the problem. Information Research: An International Electronic Journal, 22(4), 22-24.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.Prat-Sala, M., & Redolad, M. (2019). Metacognitive self-regulation and learning: A comparative study. International Journal of Educational Psychology, 8(3), 237-257.
Seale, J., & Draffan, E. (2019). The digital divide: Diversity and inclusion in online learning. Routledge.
Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1), 3-10.
Sparkes, A., & Smith, B. (2014). Qualitative research methods in sport, exercise, and health: From process to product. Routledge.
Voogt, J., Fisser, P., Good, J., Mishra, P., & Yadav, A. (2018). Computational thinking in compulsory education: Towards an agenda for research and practice. Education and Information Technologies, 23(2), 787-805.
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Universidad Santo Tomás
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
