La fundamental convergencia teórica entre el pensamiento económico de Adam Smith y el de los pioneros de la sociología británica
The fundamental theoretical convergence between Adam Smith’s economic thinking and that of the pioneers of British sociology
Abstract (en)
With this research, we want to demonstrate the fundamental theoretical convergence between the economic thought of Adam Smith, author who for many economists of today is the founder of their discipline, and of the pioneers of the British sociology: Adam Ferguson and John Millar. To this end, we group and compare the principles defended by these three authors around six categories: teleology, epistemology, methodology, individual agents, organizations and institutions. In view of the results, we conclude that this theoretical convergence, not only exists, but also can be explained according to their common origin in the work of David Hume.Abstract (es)
Con esta investigación pretendemos demostrar la fundamental convergencia teórica
existente entre el pensamiento económico de Adam Smith, autor que para muchos economistas actuales es el fundador de su disciplina, y el de los pioneros de la sociología británica: Adam Ferguson y John Millar. Para tal fin, agrupamos y comparamos los postulados defendidos por estos tres autores en torno a seis categorías: teleología, epistemología, metodología, agente individual, organizaciones e instituciones. A la vista de los resultados, concluimos que dicha convergencia teórica no solo existe, sino que, además, puede explicarse atendiendo a su común origen en la obra de David Hume.
References
Barnes, H. E. (1917). Sociology before Comte: A summary of doctrines and an introduction to the literature. American Journal of Sociology, 23(2),174-247.
Benton, T. (1978). How many Sociologies? The Sociological Review, 26, 217-236. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-954X.1978.tb00131.x
Brewer, J. D. (2007). Putting Adam Ferguson in his place. The British Journal of Sociology, 58(1), 105-122. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-4446.2007.00141.x
Bryson, G. (1939). Some eighteenth-century conceptions of society. The Sociological Review, 31,401-421.
Ferguson, A. ([1767] 1782). An essay on the history of civil society. Londres: T. Cadell.
Habermas, J. (1968). Conocimiento e interés. En: M. Jiménez (Ed.), Jürgen Habermas. Conocimiento e interés. Edmund Husserl. La filosofía en la crisis de la humanidad europea. Valencia: Universitat de Valencia.
Hayek, F. A. von. (1946). Individualism: True and false. En F. Hayek, Individualism and economic order. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Hume, D. ([1739] 1896). Treatise of human nature. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
________. ([1754-1761] 1842-1844). Historia de Inglaterra desde la invasión de Julio César hasta el fin del reinado de Jacobo II (año de JC, 1689) (cuatro volúmenes). Barcelona: Imprenta de Francisco Oliva.
________. ([1777] 1987). Essays moral, political, literary. Indianápolis: Liberty Fund. Recuperado de http://lf-oll.s3.amazonaws.com/titles/704/0059_Bk.pdf
________. (1826). The philosophical works of David Hume. Including all the essays, and exhibiting the more important alterations and corrections in the successive editions by the author (cuatro volúmenes). Edimburgo: Adam Black y William Tait.
Lamo de Espinosa, E. (2001). La sociología del siglo XX. REIS. Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas, 96, 21-49. Recuperado de goo.gl/afRR5O
Lehmann, W. C. (1930). Adam Ferguson and the beginnings of modern sociology. Nueva York: Columbia University Press.
_____________. (1960). John Millar of Glasgow 1735-1801: His life and thought and his contributions to sociological analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mellizo, C. (1999). Prólogo. En D. Hume, Diálogos sobre la religión natural. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
MacRae, D. G. (1969). Adam Ferguson. En The founding fathers of social science (pp. 17-26). Londres: Penguin Books.
Millar, J. ([1771] 2006). The origin of the distinction of ranks; or, an inquiry into the circumstances which give rise to influence and authority in the different members of society. Indianápolis:
Liberty Fund. Recuperado de http://lf-oll.s3.amazonaws.com/titles/287/1342_LFeBk.pdf
_______. ([1803] 2006). An historical view of the English government, from the settlement of the Saxons in Britain to the revolution in 1688. Indianápolis: Liberty Fund. Recuperado de http://lf-oll.s3.amazonaws.com/titles/1886/1365_LFeBk.pdf
Searle, J. R. ([1995] 1997). La construcción de la realidad social. Barcelona: Paidós.
Skinner, A. S. (1972). Adam Smith: Philosophy and science. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 19(3), 307-319. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9485.1972.tb00527.x
___________. (1976). Adam Smith: The development of a system. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 23(2), 111-132. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9485.1976.tb00769.x
Small, A. W. (1907). Adam Smith and modern sociology: A Study in the methodology of the social sciences. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Smith, A. ([1759] 1853). The theory of moral sentiments; or, an essay towards an analysis of the principles by which men naturally judge concerning the conduct and character, first of their neighbors, and afterwards of themselves. To which is added, a dissertation on the origins of languages. Londres: Henry G. Bohn.
_______. ([1762-63] 1896). Lectures on justice, police, revenue and arms. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
_______. ([1776] 1904). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. (Vol. I y II). Londres: Methuen.
_______. (1795). Essays on philosophical subject by the late Adam Smith, LL. D. Londres y Edimburgo: T. Cadell Jun. y W. Davies (Successors to Mr. Cadell).
Stewart, D. (1795). Account of the life and writings of Adam Smith LL.D. En Essays on philosophical subject by the late Adam Smith, LL.D. Londres y Edimburgo: T. Cadell Jun. y W. Davies (Successors to Mr. Cadell).
Swingewood, A. (1970). Origins of sociology: The case of the Scottish enlightenment. The British Journal of Sociology, 21(2), 164-180. DOI: 10.2307/588406
How to Cite
License
CIFE Journal is under license Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
ASSIGNMENT OF AUTHOR'S PATRIMONIAL RIGHTS
_____________________,adult, identified with citizenship card No. _________ issued in the city of____________,henceforth the Assignor, in my capacity as author of the article __________________________________________________, to be published in thejournal _____________________________,volume____,number _____,year________in physical copies in the institutional portal, website or any known or future means, I express my willingness to give gratuitously the economic rights arising from the aforementioned article, in favor of the University of Santo Tomás, (hereinafter ASSIGNEE) specifically for the Journal_______________________in volume and year mentioned above.
THE ASSIGNOR declares that all contents of the aforementioned works are of his own, which are unpublished, that are not being evaluated by another institution, who has alienated them to third parties, which has no legal or contractual restriction that prohibits you authorize open publication and print media, digital access and make it visible in the databases and indexes where the magazine be indexed; The assignor is willing to go to sanitation by any action claim, plagiarism or other type of claim that might arise in this regard.
For all purposes to which it has place the applicable law in respect of this assignment will be legislation on the rights of prime author in the territory of Colombia as well as international treaties on this matter are accepted and incorporated into national legislation and additional legislation is issued on the matter.
Under this assignment, the assignee is authorized to copy, reproduce, distribute, publish, market the article under the transfer by any digital means, electronic or photocopying, known or unknown, retaining the obligation to respect in any case the author's moral rights contained in Article 30 of law 23 of 1982, law 1450 of 2011 and law 1520 of 2012.
It is signed in acceptance to the____day of ______
