Principios de justicia distributiva en trabajos experimentales con niños
Principles of Distributive Justice in Experimental Work with Children
Princípios de justiça distributiva no trabalho experimental com crianças
Resumen (es)
Los trabajos experimentales que tienen por objeto examinar principios de justicia distributiva en niños pueden ser leídos como el esfuerzo por presentar metodologías en las que se constata el reconocimiento y la práctica de los principios a edades cada vez más tempranas. La lectura crítica de fuentes implicada por la revisión de la literatura especializada mostró la posibilidad de clasificar los estudios experimentales con niños en cuatro periodos. El primero asiste a las contribuciones efectuadas por Piaget, Kohlberg y Damon. Posteriormente, se examinan los hallazgos en la infancia media. Con respecto a la primera infancia, se ha detectado que los estudios se dividen en los que examinan niños de edad preescolar y los que cuentan con participantes bebés de dos años de vida. El recorrido muestra que la discusión de los estudios experimentales con los trabajos de los precursores está centrado en identificar los principios a edades más tempranas.
Resumen (en)
Experimental work aimed at examining principles of distributive justice in children can be interpreted as an effort to present methodologies that confirm the recognition and practice of these principles at increasingly early ages. The critical reading of sources implied by the review of specialized literature showed the possibility of classifying experimental studies with children into four periods. The first one corresponds to the contributions made by Piaget, Kohlberg, and Damon. Subsequently, findings in middle childhood are examined. Regarding early childhood, it has been observed that studies are divided into those examining preschool-aged children and those involving two-year-old infants. The overview shows that the discussion of experimental studies with the works of precursors is focused on identifying the principles at earlier ages.
Resumen (pt)
O trabalho experimental com o objetivo de examinar os princípios de justiça distributiva com crianças pode ser lido como um esforço para apresentar metodologias em que se observam o reconhecimento e a prática dos princípios em idades cada vez menores. A leitura crítica das fontes implicada pela revisão da literatura especializada mostrou a possibilidade de classificar os estudos experimentais com crianças em quatro períodos. O primeiro diz respeito às contribuições feitas por Piaget, Kohlberg e Damon. Em seguida, são examinadas as descobertas na meia infância. Com relação à primeira infância, verificou-se que os estudos estão divididos entre aqueles que examinam crianças em idade pré-escolar e aqueles com participantes de dois anos de idade. O panorama mostra que a discussão de estudos experimentais com trabalhos precursores se concentra na identificação de princípios em idades mais precoces.
Referencias
Anderson, N. y Cuneo, D. (1978). The Height + width Rule in Children’s Judgments of Quantity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 107(4), 335-378. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.107.4.335
Angarita, R. G. y Viciana, H. (2022). Merit is not Meritorious Everywhere: Fairness in First and Third Party Tasks among Kogi Children. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 22(3-4), 246-263. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685373-12340134
Baumard, N., Mascaro, O. y Chevallier, C. (2012). Preschoolers are Able to Take Merit into Account when Distributing Goods. Developmental Psychology, 48(2), 492-498. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0026598
Blake, P. y McAuliffe, K. (2011). “I Had so Much it didn’t seem Fair”: Eight-year-olds Reject two Forms of Inequity. Cognition, 120(2), 215-224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2011.04.006
Blake, P. R., McAuliffe, K., Corbit, J., Callaghan, T. C., Barry, O., Bowie, A., Kleutsch, L., Kramer, K., Ross, E., Vongsachang, H., Wrangham, R. y Warneken, F. (2015). The Ontogeny of Fairness in Seven Societies. Nature, 528(7581), 258-261. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature15703
Bogin, B. y Smith, B. H. (1996). Evolution of the Human Life Cycle. American Journal of Human Biology, 8(6), 703-716. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1520-6300(1996)8:6<703::aid-ajhb2>3.0.co;2-u
Casey, B. J. y Richards, J. E. (1988). Sustained Visual Attention in Young Infants Measured with an Adapted Version of the Visual Preference Paradigm. Child Development, 59(6), 1514-1521.
https://doi.org/10.2307/1130666
Chernyak, N., Harris, P. L. y Cordes, S. (2018). Explaining Early Moral Hypocrisy: Numerical Cognition Promotes Equal Sharing Behavior in Preschool-aged Children. Developmental Science, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12695.
Chernyak, N., Sandham, B., Harris, P. L. y Cordes, S. (2016). Numerical Cognition Explains Age-related Changes in Third-party Fairness. Developmental Psychology, 52(10), 1555-1562. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/dev0000196
Chevallier, C., Xu, J., Adachi, K., van der Henst, J-B. y Baumard. N. (2015). Preschoolers’ Understanding of Merit in Two Asian Societies. PLOS ONE, 10(5), e0114717. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114717
Colombia por la Primera Infancia. (2006). Política pública por los niños y niñas, desde la gestación hasta los 6 años. http://www.accionambiental.org/principal/secciones/documentos/Doctos%20Ni%C3%B1ez/politica%20de%2 0primera%20infancia.pdf
Croy, I., Sehlstedt, I., Wasling, H. B., Ackerley, R. y Olausson, H. (2017). Gentle Touch Perception: From Early Childhood to Adolescence. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2017.07.009
Dahl, A. (2014). Definitions and Developmental Processes in Research on Infant Morality. Human Development, 57(4), 241-249. http://doi.org/10.1159/000364919.
Dahl, A. y Freda, G. F. (2017). How Young Children Come to View Harming Others as Wrong: a Developmental Analysis. En J. Sommerville y J. Decety (Eds.), Social Cognition: Development across the Life Span (pp. 151-184). Routledge.
Dahl, A. y Killen, M. (2018). A Developmental Perspective on the Origins of Morality in Infancy and Early Childhood. Frontiers in Psychology, 9:1736. http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01736
Damon, W. (1975). Early Conceptions of Positive Justice as Related to the Development of Logical Operations. Child Development, 46(2), 301-312. http://doi.org/10.2307/1128122
Damon, W. (1997). Foreword to the 1997 Edition. En J. Piaget, The Moral Judgement of the Child. Free Press.
Dewey, J. (1939). Theory of Valuation. University of Chicago Press.
Engelmann, J. M. y Tomasello, M. (2019). Children’s Sense of Fairness as Equal Respect. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23(6), 454-463. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2019.03.001
Fagan, J. F. (1984). Infant Memory. En M. Moscovitch (ed.), Infant Memory. Advances in the Study of Communication and Affect, vol. 9. Springer.
Fehr, E., Bernhard, H. y Rockenbach, B. (2008). Egalitarianism in Young children. Nature, 454(7208), 1079-1083. http://doi.org/10.1038/nature07155
Fehr, E., Glätzle-Rützler, D. y Sutter, M. (2013). The Development of Egalitarianism, Altruism, Spite and Parochialism in Childhood and Adolescence. Eur. Econ. Rev. 64, 369-383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2013.09.006
Forsé, M., Richardot, S., Frénod, A., Guibet-Lafaye, C. y Parodi, M. (2016). The Sense of Distributive Justice in Children from 6 to 10: Equality Predominates but Sharing Norms are Different Depending on School Performance. Revue européenne des sciences sociales, 54-1(1), 13-36. https://www.cairn.info/revue-revue-europeenne-des-sciences-sociales-2016-1-page-13.htm
Fantz, R. (1963). Pattern Vision in Newborn Infants. Science, 140(3564), 296-297. http://doi.org/10.1126/science.140.3564.296
Geraci, A. y Surian, L. (2011). The Developmental Roots of Fairness: Infants’ Reactions to Equal and Unequal Distributions of Resources. Developmental Science, 14(5), 1012-1020. http://doi.org/doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2011.01048.xh
Guichard, S., Gil, N. y Cadima J. (2021). Elementary School Children’s Perspectives on Distributive Justice in Trade. The Journal of Educational Research, 114(4), 418-430. http://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2021.1962233
Hamann, K., Warneken, F., Greenberg, J. R. y Tomasello, M. (2011). Collaboration Encourages Equal Sharing in Children but not Chimpanzees. Nature, 476, 328-331. http://doi.org/10.1038/nature10278
Hamann, K., Bender, J. y Tomasello, M. (2014). Meritocratic Sharing is Based on Collaboration in 3-year-olds. Developmental Psychology, 50(1), 121-128. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0032965
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J. y Norenzayan, A. (2010a). Most People are not WEIRD. Nature, 466, 29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/466029a
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J. y Norenzayan, A. (2010b). The Weirdest People in the World? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33, 61-83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0999152X
House, B. R., Silk, J. B., Henrich, J., Barrett, H. C., Scelza, B. A., Boyette, A. H., Hewlettd, B., McElreath, R. y Laurence, S. (2013a). Ontogeny of Prosocial Behavior across Diverse Societies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(36), 14586-14591. http://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1221217110
House, B. R., Henrich, J., Brosnan, S. F. y Silk, J. B. (2012). The Ontogeny of Human Prosociality: Behavioral Experiments with Children Aged 3 to 8. Evolution and Human Behavior, 33(4), 291-308. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2011.10.007
House, B., Henrich, J., Sarnecka, B. y Silk, J. B. (2013b). The Development of Contingent Reciprocity in Children. Evolution and Human Behavior, 34(2), 86-93. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2012.10.001
Huppert, E., Cowell, J. M., Cheng, Y., Contreras-Ibáñez, C., Gomez-Sicard, N., Gonzalez-Gaeda, L. M., … Decety, J. (2018). The Development of Children’s Preferences for Equality and Equity across 13 Individualistic and Collectivist Cultures. Developmental Science, 22(2), e12729. http://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12729
Jaramillo, L. (2007). Concepciones de infancia. Zona Próxima, 8, 108-123. https://rcientificas.uninorte.edu.co/index.php/zona/article/view/1687/4634
Jennings, A. B. (2019). I’ll Share with Her, but not with You: A Mixed Methods Approach to Investigating Children’s Naïve Theories about Resource Allocation Decisions. International Review of Economics Education, 32(C), 100162. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.iree.2019.100162
Kenward, B. y Dahl, M. (2011). Preschoolers Distribute Scarce Resources According to the Moral Valence of Recipients’ Previous Actions. Developmental Psychology, 47(4), 1054-1064. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0023869
Kienbaum, J. y Wilkening, F. (2009). Children’s and Adolescents’ Intuitive Judgements about Distributive Justice: Integrating Need, Effort, and Luck. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 6(4), 481-498. http://doi.org/10.1080/17405620701497299
Kienbaum, J. y Mairhofer, S. (2022). Need, Effort, or Integration? The Development of Intuitive Distributive Justice Decisions in Children, Adolescents, and Adults. Social Development, 31, 603-618. https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12563
Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stage and Sequence: The Cognitive-developmental Approach to Socialization. En D. Goslin (Ed.), Handbook of Socialization Theory and Research (pp. 347–480). Rand McNally.
Leigh, S. (2004). Brain Growth, Life History, and Cognition in Primate and Human Evolution. American Journal of Primatology, 62(3), 139-164. http://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.20012
Liénard, P., Baumard, N., Mascaro, O., Kiura, P. y Chevallier, C. (2013). Early Understanding of Merit in Turkana Children. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 13(1-2), 57-66. http://doi.org/10.1163/15685373-12342084
Li, W., Curtis, R., Moore, C., Wang, Y. y Zeng, X. (2019). To Be Fair, Generous, or Selfish: The Effect of Relationship on Chinese Children’s Distributive Allocation and Procedural Application. Soc. Dev., 28, 449-464. https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12341
Lutz, D. J., Termini, P. V. y Cramer, R. E. (1988). Distributive Justice Reasoning in Hearing and Hearing-impaired Children. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 9(3), 275-285. http://doi.org/10.1016/0193-3973(88)90030-5.
McAuliffe, K., Blake, P. R., Kim, G., Wrangham, R. W. y Warneken, F. (2013). Social Influences on Inequity Aversion in Children. PLOS ONE, 8(12), e80966. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0080966
McCambridge, J., de Bruin, M. y Witton, J. (2012). The Effects of Demand Characteristics on Research Participant Behaviours in Non-Laboratory Settings: A Systematic Review. PLOS ONE, 7(6), e39116. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0039116.
McGillicuddy-De Lisi, A. V., Watkins, C. y Vinchur, A. J. (1994). The Effect of Relationship on Children’s Distributive Justice Reasoning. Child Development, 65, 1694-1700. http://doi.org/doi:10.2307/1131288
McGillicuddy-De Lisi, A. V., Daly, M. y Neal, A. (2006). Children’s Distributive Justice judgments: Aversive Racism in Euro-American Children? Child Development, 77, 1063-1080. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00919.x
Musen, P., Coger, J. y Kagan, J. (1972). Desarrollo de la personalidad en el niño. Trillas.
Noh, J. (2019). Children’s Developing Understanding of Merit in a Distributive Justice Context. Journal of Child and family studies, 29(5), 1484-1492. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-019-01606-2.
Noh, J. Y., D’Esterre, A. y Killen, M. (2019). Effort or Outcome? Children’s Meritorious Decisions. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 178, 1-14. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2018.09.005
Onishi, K. y Baillargeon, R. (2005). Do 15-Month-Old Infants Understand False Beliefs? Science, 308(5719), 255-258. http://doi.org/10.1126/science.1107621
Orne, M. T. (1962). On the Social Psychology of the Psychological Experiment: With Particular Reference to Demand Characteristics and their Implications. American Psychologist, 17(11), 776-783. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043424
Orne, M. T. (1959). The Nature of Hypnosis: Artifact and Essence. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 58(3), 277-299. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0046128
Paulus, M. (2015). Children’s Inequity Aversion Depends on Culture: A Cross-cultural Comparison. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 132, 240-246. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2014.12.007
Pérez, E. Mestre, V., Martí, M. y Samper, P. (1996). Orígenes históricos del libro de Jena Piaget sobre “El juicio moral en el niño”: sus fuentes filosóficas y científicas. Revista de historia de la Psicología, 17(3-4), 135-144. https://journals.copmadrid.org/historia/art/0e4a2c65bdaddd66a53422d93daebe68
Pérez, E. (2000). Moral de convicciones, moral de principios: una introducción a la ética desde las ciencias humanas. Edibesa.
Piaget, J. (1974). El criterio moral en el niño. Fontanella.
Piaget, J. (1965). The Moral Judgment of the Child. Free Press.
Pilgrim, C. y Rueda-Riedle, A. (2002). The Importance of Social Context in Cross-cultural Comparisons: First Graders in Columbia and the United States. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 163(3), 283-295.
Reis, R. y Sampaio, L. (2019). Child Distributive Behavior and Inhibitory Control in a Private Context. Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto), 29, e2933. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-4327e2933
Rochat, P., Dias, M. D. G., Guo Liping, Broesch, T., Passos-Ferreira, C., Winning, A. y Berg, B. (2009). Fairness in Distributive Justice by 3- and 5-Year-Olds Across Seven Cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 40(3), 416-442. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022109332844
Rottman, J., Zizik, V., Minard, K., Young, L., Blake, P. R. y Kelemen, D. (2020). The Moral, or the Story? Changing Children’s Distributive Justice Preferences through Social Communication. Cognition, 205, 104441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104441
Schäfer, M., Haun, D. B. M. y Tomasello, M. (2015). Fair Is Not Fair Everywhere. Psychological Science, 26(8), 1252-1260. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 0956797615586188
Schmidt, M. F. H. y Sommerville, J. A. (2011). Fairness Expectations and Altruistic Sharing in 15-Month-Old Human Infants. PLOS ONE, 6(10), e23223. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0023223
Sigelman, C. K. y Waitzman, K. A. (1991). The Development of Distributive Justice Orientations: Contextual Influences on Children’s Resource Allocations. Child Development, 62, 1367-1378. https://doi.org/10.2307/1130812
Sloane, S., Baillargeon, R. y Premack, D. (2012). Do Infants Have a Sense of Fairness? Psychological Science, 23(2), 196-204. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611422072
Smith, C. y Warneken, F. (2016). Children’s Reasoning about Distributive and Retributive Justice across Development. Developmental Psychology, 52(4), 613-628. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0040069
Smith, L. (1995). Introduction to Piaget’s Sociological Studies. En J. Piaget, Sociological Studies. Routledge.
Smith, A. (1978). Lawrence Kohlberg’s Cognitive Stage Theory of the Development of Moral Judgment. New Directions for Student Services, 1978, 53-67. https://doi.org/10.1002/ss.37119780406
Sommerville, J. A., Schmidt, M. F. H., Yun, J.‐e. y Burns, M. (2013). The Development of Fairness Expectations and Prosocial Behavior in the Second Year of Life. Infancy, 18(1), 40-66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7078.2012.00129.x
Surian, L. y Franchin, L. (2017). Infants Reason about Deserving Agents: A Test with Distributive Actions. Cognitive Development, 44, 49-56. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2017.08.009
Thompson, J. L. y Nelson, A. J. (2011). Middle Childhood and Modern Human Origins. Human Nature, 22(3), 249-280. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s12110-011-9119-3
Ulber, J., Hamann, K. y Tomasello, M. (2017). Young Children, but not Chimpanzees, are Averse to Disadvantageous and Advantageous Inequities. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 155, 48-66. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2016.10.013
Warneken, F., Lohse, K., Melis, A. P. y Tomasello, M. (2010). Young Children Share the Spoils After Collaboration. Psychological Science, 22(2), 267-273. https:// doi.org/10.1177/0956797610395392
Wong, M. y Nunes, T. (2003). Hong Kong Children’s Concept of Distributive Justice. Early Child Development and Care, 173(1), 119-129. https://doi.org/10.1080/0300443022000022477
Zhang, Z. (2020). The Impact of Social Relationships on Children’s Distributive Justice. Developmental Psychology, 56(1), 103-116. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000855
Cómo citar
Licencia
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Avisos de derechos de autor propuestos por Creative Commons
Los autores/as conservarán sus derechos de autor y garantizarán a la revista el derecho de primera publicación de su obra, el cuál estará simultáneamente sujeto a la Licencia de reconocimiento de Creative Commons que permite a terceros compartir la obra siempre que se indique su autor y su primera publicación esta revista.
Los autores/as podrán adoptar otros acuerdos de licencia no exclusiva de distribución de la versión de la obra publicada (p. ej.: depositarla en un archivo telemático institucional o publicarla en un volumen monográfico) siempre que se indique la publicación inicial en esta revista.
Se permite y recomienda a los autores/as difundir su obra a través de Internet (p. ej.: en archivos telemáticos institucionales o en su página web) antes y durante el proceso de envío, lo cual puede producir intercambios interesantes y aumentar las citas de la obra publicada.
Análisis está bajo una licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
La Universidad Santo Tomás conserva los derechos patrimoniales de las obras publicadas, y favorece y permite la reutilización de las mismas bajo la licencia anteriormente mencionada.
