Procedural Law and Sustainable Development: An Analysis of the Colombian Reality
El Derecho Procesal y el Desarrollo Sostenible:: Un análisis de la realidad colombiana
Direito Processual e Desenvolvimento Sustentável: Uma Análise da Realidade Colombiana: uma Análise da Realidade Colombiana
Resumen (es)
El presente proyecto de investigación de semillero pretende analizar el derecho procesal y el desarrollo sostenible frente a los retos de la realidad colombiana. Es una investigación cualitativa de tipo descriptiva basada en el uso de bases de datos de consulta a nivel internacional, nacional, doctrinal y jurídico con herramientas tales como buscadores en Scopus y Ebsco, así como datos de gobierno actualizados y pertinentes, que permiten identificar la problemática y responder a los objetivos trazados. Los resultados revelan que un alto porcentaje de la población colombiana sufre las consecuencias de un Estado ausente y que no responde de manera diligente a sus necesidades básicas, incluido el acceso a la justicia en condiciones de igualdad. Esto genera una brecha en la administración de justicia efectiva y en condiciones de equidad, lo que obstaculiza la sostenibilidad en el presente y en el futuro cercano y retarda la paz, la justicia y las instituciones sólidas.
Resumen (en)
The present research hotbed project aims to analyze procedural law and sustainable development in the face of the challenges of the Colombian reality. It is a qualitative, descriptive study based on international, national, doctrinal, and legal databases, utilizing tools such as Scopus and Ebsco search engines and up-to-date and relevant government data to identify issues and achieve set objectives. The results reveal that a high percentage of the Colombian population suffers the consequences of an absent State that does not respond promptly to their basic needs, including equal access to justice. This creates a gap in the effective administration of justice and equitable conditions, hindering sustainability in the present and the near future and delaying peace, justice, and robust institutions.
Resumen (pt)
O presente projeto de pesquisa tem como objetivo analisar o direito processual e o desenvolvimento sustentável diante dos desafios da realidade colombiana. Trata-se de um estudo qualitativo, descritivo, baseado em bases de dados internacionais, nacionais, doutrinárias e legais, usando ferramentas como os motores de busca Scopus e Ebsco e dados governamentais atualizados e pertinentes para identificar questões e alcançar objetivos estabelecidos. Os resultados revelam que uma alta porcentagem da população colombiana sofre as consequências de um Estado ausente que não responde prontamente às suas necessidades básicas, incluindo o acesso igualitário à justiça. Isso cria uma lacuna na administração eficaz da justiça e condições equitativas, dificultando a sustentabilidade no presente e no futuro próximo, e atrasando a paz, a justiça e instituições robustas.
Referencias
Aristizábal, J. F. (2019). La teoría pura del derecho y la exclusión de la sociología. Revista IUSTA, 1(50), 121–143. https://doi.org/10.15332/1900-0448.2019.0050.05
Cabrera Jiménez, M. F., & García-Castiblanco, C. P. (2021). Social Capital and Vulnerable Population: An Analysis from Local Government Entities. Revista Venezolana De Gerencia, 26(5), 370–387. https://doi.org/10.52080/rvgluz.26.e5.24
Carrillo, Y., & Bechara, A. (2019). Discretionary Judge and Guarantor: Litigation Disposal Powers in the General Code of Procedure. JURÍDICAS CUC, 15(1), 229–262. http://dx.doi.org/10.17981/juridcuc.15.1.2019.09
Chávez Yomona, M., Masías Benavides Román, A., & Rivera Fernández, D. H. (2022). Access to Justice in the Face of Digital Connectivity Challenges. Revista de Filosofía, 39(Special), 455–471. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6468773
Colombia. Political Constitution of Colombia [CP]. (1991). http://www.secretariasenado.gov.co/senado/basedoc/constitucion_politica_1991.html
Colombia. Political Constitution of Colombia [CP]. (1991). Article 229 [Title VIII]. http://www.secretariasenado.gov.co/senado/basedoc/constitucion_politica_1991_pr007.html#229
Colombia. Congress of the Republic of Colombia. (July 12, 2012). Article 103. General Code of Procedure [Law 1564 of 2012]. DO: 52.522. http://www.secretariasenado.gov.co/senado/basedoc/ley_1564_2012_pr002.html#103
Colombia. Congress of the Republic of Colombia. (May 25, 2019). By which the National Development Plan 2018 - 2022 "Pact for Colombia, Pact for Equity" is issued. [Law 1955, 2019]. Retrieved from https://www.funcionpublica.gov.co/eva/gestornormativo/norma.php?i=93970
Colombia. Congress of the Republic of Colombia. (May 7, 1996). Statutory Law of The Administration of Justice. [Law 270, 1996]. Retrieved from http://www.secretariasenado.gov.co/senado/basedoc/ley_0270_1996.html
Colombia. Presidency of the Republic of Colombia. (June 4, 2020). Decree 806 of 2020: Measures to Implement Information and Communication Technologies in Judicial Proceedings. DO: 51.335. http://www.secretariasenado.gov.co/senado/basedoc/decreto_0806_2020.html
Colombia. Judicial Branch. Superior Council of the Judiciary. (2022). Sectoral Plan of Judicial Development 2023-2026. “Towards a Reliable, Digital, and Inclusive Justice.” https://escuelajudicial.ramajudicial.gov.co/sites/default/files/Plan%20Sectorial%202022-2026%20V15%20%282%29.pdf
Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística [DANE]. (2022). Press Release: Information and Communication Technologies in Households Survey (ENTIC Homes) 2021, 1-2. https://www.dane.gov.co/files/investigaciones/boletines/entic/comunicado_entic_hogares_2021.pdf
Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística [DANE]. (2022). Situation of Rural Women from Official Statistics. Statistical Notes Series, 2-4. https://www.dane.gov.co/files/investigaciones/notas-estadisticas/oct-2022-nota-estadistica-mujer-rural-presentacion.pdf
Departamento Nacional de Planeación [DNP]. (2023a). ABC of Dialogues. http://www.dnp.gov.co
Departamento Nacional de Planeación [DNP]. (2023b). National Development Plan 2022-2026. https://www.dnp.gov.co/plan-nacional-desarrollo/pnd-2022-2026
Díaz, J. (2020). Reflections on the Principles of Promptness, Impartiality, and Efficiency in the General Code of Procedure. Jurídicas CUC, 16(1), 407–444. http://dx.doi.org/10.17981/ juridcuc.16.1.2020.18
Duque Ayala, C. (2012). The Mixed System of Administrative Litigation and Its Technological Component: Comparative Analysis. Verba Luris, (28), 69–92. https://revistas.unilibre.edu.co/index.php/verbaiuris/article/view/2203
Externado University of Colombia. (2023). National Development Plan: Weaknesses and Strengths. Retrieved from https://www.uexternado.edu.co/agencia-de-noticias/plan-nacional-de-desarrollo-debilidades-y-fortaleza/.
Frigo, M. (2021). International Commission of Jurists. Colombia: ICJ and IACHR Alert the Human Rights Council about Widespread Human Rights Violations During Protests. https://www.icj.org/colombia-la-cij-y-la-ccj-alertan-al-consejo-de-derechos-humanos-acerca-de-las-violaciones-generalizadas-de-derechos-humanos-cometidas-durante-las-protestas-2/
Galvis Vega, G., Alfonso Acosta, G., Rodríguez Peñaloza, A., Cabeza Zambrano, C., Olarte Mojica, L., Garzón Fierro, V., Chaves Rodríguez, P., & Trespalacios Rojas, I. (2022). Artificial Intelligence in the Prediction of Judicial Decisions as a Mixed Welfare Model: Between Codification and Equitable Justice.
Gómez Osorio, Ángela M., Herrera Mejía, J. A., Castañeda Ruiz, H. N., & Muñoz Zapata, M. A. (2023). Strategies for Community Participation and Recognition in Territorial Interventions. Estudios Socio-Jurídicos, 25(2). https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/sociojuridicos/a.12841
High Commissioner for Human Rights [OHCHR]. (2019). Human Rights Situation in Colombia. https://www.undocs.org/en/A/HRC/40/3/Add.3
Icaza, E., Colledani, N., & Gonzalez, I. (2011). Inequality and Social Inclusion in the Americas. Essay 14 (2nd ed.). Organization of American States. https://www.oas.org/docs/desigualdad/libro-desigualdad.pdf
Jahangeer, K. (2019). Fees and Fines: The Criminalization of Poverty. American Bar Association. https://www.americanbar.org/groups/government_public/publications/public_lawyer_articles/fees-fines/
Menendez, M., Crowley, M. F., Eisen, L.-B., & Atchison, N. (2019). The Steep Costs of Criminal Justice Fees and Fines: A Fiscal Analysis of Three States and Ten Counties. Brennan Center for Justice at New York University School of Law. https://www.brennancenter.org/sites/default/files/2019-11/Report_Criminal_Justice_Fees_Fines.pdf
Ministerio de Justicia y del Derecho. (2020). Models of Local and Rural Justice: National Government’s Bet to Ensure Relevant and Timely Justice in PDET Municipalities. https://www.minjusticia.gov.co/Sala-de-prensa/Paginas/Modelos-de-Justicia-Local-y-Rural-la-apuesta-del-Gobierno-Nacional-para-garantizar-una-justicia-pertinente-y-oportuna.aspx
National Association for the Advancement of Colored People [NAACP]. (2021). Race and Justice. https://naacp.org/issues/race-justice
Ortega Ruiz, L. G. (2023). Policies and Guidelines for the Implementation of Clear and Simple Legal Language. Novum Jus, 17(1), 99–115. https://doi.org/10.14718/NovumJus.2023.17.1.4
Palomares, J. (2015). El carácter vinculante de la jurisprudencia constitucional en el derecho alemán, en Revista Via Inveniendi et Iudicandi, 10(2), 29–56. revistas.usantotomas.edu.co/index.php/viei/article/view/2551/2483
Pan American Health Organization [PAHO]. (2022). Violence against Women. https://www.paho.org/es/temas/violencia-contra-mujer#:~:text=La%20violencia%20contra%20la%20mujer%20%2Despecialmente%20la%20ejercida%20por%20su,y%20reproductiva%20de%20las%20mujeres
Ponce, A. (2019). The Price of Justice: The High Cost of “Free.” Global Insights on Access to Justice 2019. World Justice Project. https://worldjusticeproject.org/sites/default/files/documents/WJP-A2J-2019.pdf.
Portafolio. (2023, February 25). 15% of the Colombian Population Lives in Extreme Poverty: ECLAC. https://www.portafolio.co/economia/finanzas/colombia-es-uno-de-los-paises-con-mayor-pobreza-extrema-en-latinoamerica-579000
Quintero Salazar, L. (2016). Legal Controversies in Light of Poverty Relief in Colombia. Real and Effective Access to Justice? Revista de derecho público, (36). https://dx.doi.org/10.15425/redepub.36.2016.09
Rama Judicial. (2023). Superior Council of the Judiciary Strengthens Judicial Offices in the Country with the Creation of More Than 1,700 Positions. https://www.ramajudicial.gov.co/web/consejo-superior-de-la-judicatura/-/consejo-superior-de-la-judicatura-fortalece-despachos-judiciales-en-el-pais-con-la-creacion-de-mas-de-1-700-cargos
Restrepo-Medina, M. A. (2010). Regional Study of Congestion in Administrative Jurisdiction. Estudios Socio-Jurídicos, 12(1), 263–283. https://revistas.urosario.edu.co/index.php/sociojuridicos/article/view/1192
Restrepo Tamayo, J. F., & Steven Gómez Agudelo, D. (2020). Digital Connectivity as a Fundamental Right in Colombia. Law, State and Telecommunications Review, 12(1), 113–136. https://doi.org/10.26512/lstr.v12i1.31161
Robledo Silva, P. (2020). The Rules of Brasilia in Colombia. Revista Llapanchikpaq: Justice, 1(1), 107–140. https://doi.org/10.51197/lj.v1i1.5
United Nations [UN]. (2015). Sustainable Development Goals. https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/
United Nations [UN]. (2023). United Nations Development Fund for Women (UNIFEM). https://www.refworld.org.es/publisher/UNIFEM.html
United Nations [UN] & Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean [ECLAC]. (2016). The Matrix of Social Inequality in Latin America, 50-81. https://repositorio.cepal.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/c52907b3-a3dc-4866-8f4c-c19491c2b83a/content
Universidad Externado de Colombia. (2023). National Development Plan: Weaknesses and Strengths. https://www.uexternado.edu.co/agencia-de-noticias/plan-nacional-de-desarrollo-debilidades-y-fortaleza/.
Valderrama, I. (2016). El principio de congruencia en el proceso penal. Revista Via inveniendi et Iudicandi, 11(2), 159–180.
Vargas Florián, S. M. (2018). La fuerza vinculante de la jurisprudencia del Consejo de Estado. IUSTA, 1(48), 119–144. https://doi.org/10.15332/s1900-0448.2018.0048.05
Velez Rojas, J. (2023). International Commission of Jurists. Colombia: Human rights defenders continue to face pressure and attacks. https://www.icj.org/colombia-human-rights-defenders-continue-to-face-pressure-and-attacks/
World Health Organization [WHO]. (2022). Gender and Access to Justice: Addressing Barriers to Women’s Justice. https://www.who.int/
Cómo citar
Licencia
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Los autores mantienen los derechos sobre los artículos y por tanto son libres de compartir, copiar, distribuir, ejecutar y comunicar públicamente la obra bajo las condiciones siguientes:
Reconocer los créditos de la obra de la manera especificada por el autor o el licenciante (pero no de una manera que sugiera que tiene su apoyo o que apoyan el uso que hace de su obra).
Revista IUSTA está bajo una licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
La Universidad Santo Tomás conserva los derechos patrimoniales (copyright) de las obras publicadas, y favorece y permite la reutilización de las mismas bajo la licencia anteriormente mencionada.
