La fundamental convergencia teórica entre el pensamiento económico de la escuela monetarista de Chicago y el de los sociólogos constructivistas moderados: Agente individual, organizaciones e instituciones
The fundamental theoretical convergence between the economic thought of the Chicago monetarist school and that of the moderate constructivist sociologists: individual agent, organizations and institutions
Abstract (en)
This research aims to demonstrate the fundamental theoretical convergence between the contributions from economists of the Chicago monetarist school and those from the moderate constructivist sociologists, for certain specific areas of their analysis. To this end, we group these contributions in three categories: individual agent, organizations and institutions. In this sense, we conclude that their formal maximizing agent model presents a limited rationality, operates in imperfect information environments, attributes costs to its decision making process and develops rational expectations. Furthermore, in relation to organizations, these authors examine the relationship between forms of ownership and management in companies, understand these as mechanisms to reduce uncertainty, consider the division of labor as a fundamental principle of its operation and study the behavior of oligopolies, State and unions in the market. Finally, they understand institutions as general, natural and potentially conflicting phenomena.
Abstract (es)
La presente investigación pretende demostrar la fundamental convergencia teórica existente entre las aportaciones procedentes de los economistas de la escuela monetarista de Chicago y las de los sociólogos constructivistas moderados, para ciertas esferas concretas de sus análisis. Con tal propósito, se agrupan estas contribuciones en torno a tres categorías: agente individual, organizaciones e instituciones. En este sentido, se concluye con que su modelo formal maximizador de agente presenta una racionalidad limitada, opera en entornos de información imperfecta, imputa costes a su proceso de toma de decisiones y desarrolla expectativas racionales. Además, en relación con las organizaciones, estos autores examinan la relación entre formas de propiedad y gestión en las empresas, comprenden estas como mecanismos de reducción de la incertidumbre, consideran la división del trabajo como un principio fundamental de su funcionamiento y estudian el comportamiento de oligopolios, Estado y sindicatos en el mercado. Finalmente, comprenden las instituciones como fenómenos generales, naturales y potencialmente conflictivos.
References
Bell, D. (2001). El advenimiento de la sociedad posindustrial. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
Bell, D. (1989). Las contradicciones culturales del capitalismo. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
Bell, D. (1984). Las ciencias sociales desde la segunda guerra mundial. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
Castells, M. (2005). La era de la información. Vol. I: la sociedad red. (3.ª ed.). Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
Drucker, P. F. (1969). The age of discontinuity. Guidelines to our changing society. Londres: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Drucker, P. F. (1990). Managing the non-profit organization: Practices and principles. Londres: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Drucker, P. F. (1993). La sociedad poscapitalista. Barcelona: Apóstrofe.
Drucker, P. F. (1999). Modern Prophets: Schumpeter or Keynes? The Frontiers of Management. Nueva York: Penguin Putnam, Inc.
Friedman, M. (1953). The methodology of positive economics. In D. Hausman (Ed.), 2008, The philosophy of economics. An anthology (pp. 145-178). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Doi: 10.1017/cbo9780511819025.010
Friedman, M. (1993). Teoría de los precios. Barcelona: Altaya.
Friedman, M. (1968). The role of monetary policy. American Economic Review, 58(1), 1-18.
Friedman M. (2007) The social responsibility of business Is to increase its profits. En W. C. Zimmerli, M. Holzinger y K. Richter (Eds.), Corporate ethics and corporate governance (pp. 173-174). Berlin: Springer.
Hernández, S. (2018). La fundamental convergencia teórica entre el pensamiento económico de la escuela monetarista de Chicago y el de los sociólogos constructivistas moderados: Teleología, epistemología y metodología. Revista CIFE: Lecturas de Economía Social, 20(32).
Lamo de Espinosa, E. (2001). La sociología del siglo XX. REIS. Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas, 96, 21-49. Doi: 10.2307/40184382
Lucas, R. E. (1972). Expectations and the neutrality of money. Journal of Economic Theory, 4(2), 103-124. Doi: 10.1016/0022-0531(72)90142-1
Lucas, R. E. (1975). An equilibrium model of the business cycle. Journal of Political Economy, 83(6), 1113-1144. Doi: 10.1086/260386
Lucas, R. E. (1976). Econometric policy evaluation: A critique. In K. Brunner y A. Meltzer (Eds.), The phillips curve and labor markets (pp. 19-46). Amsterdam: North Holland. Doi: 10.1016/s0167-2231(76)80003-6
Lucas, R. E. y Sargent, T. J. (1978). After keynesian macroeconomics. Quarterly Review, 3(2), 1-16.
Muth, J. F. (1961). Rational expectations and the theory of price movements. Econometrica, 29(3), 315-335. Doi: 10.2307/1909635
Sargent, T. J. y Wallace, N. (1976). Rational expectations and the theory of economic policy. Journal of Monetary Economics, 2(2), 169-183. Doi: 10.1016/0304-3932(76)90032-5
Searle, J. R. (1997). La construcción de la realidad social. Barcelona: Paidós.
Simon, H. A. (1976). Administrative behavior. New York: Free Press.
Stigler, G. J. (1951). The division of labor is limited by the extent of the market. Journal of Political Economy, 59(3), 185-193. Doi: 10.1086/257075
Stigler, G. J. (1961). The economics of information. The Journal of Political Economy, 69(3), 213-225. Doi: 10.1086/258464
Stigler, G. J. (1964). A theory of oligopoly. The Journal of Political Economy, 72(1), 44-61. Doi: 10.1086/258853
Stigler, G. J. (1965). Essays in the history of economics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Stigler, G. J. (1971). The theory of economic regulation. The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 2(1), 3-21. Doi: 10.2307/300316
Stigler, G. J. (1974). The optimum enforcement of laws. In G. S. Becker y W. M. Landes (Eds.), Essays in the economics of crime and punishment (pp. 55-67). New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Stigler, G. J. (1982). The process and progress of economics. Nobel memorial lecture, 8 December, 1982. In K. Mäller (Ed.), Nobel lectures in economic sciences. 1981-1990 (pp. 57-76). Singapur: World Scientific Publishing Co.
Stigler, G. J. (1992). Law or economics? Journal of Law and Economics, 35(2), 455-468. Doi: 10.1086/467262
Stigler, G. J. y Becker, G. S. (1977). De gustibus non est disputandum. The American Economic Review, 67(2), 76-90.
Stigler, G. J. y Sherwin, R. A. (1985). The extent of the market. Journal of Law and Economies, 28(3), 555-585. Doi: 10.1086/467101
How to Cite
License
CIFE Journal is under license Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
ASSIGNMENT OF AUTHOR'S PATRIMONIAL RIGHTS
_____________________,adult, identified with citizenship card No. _________ issued in the city of____________,henceforth the Assignor, in my capacity as author of the article __________________________________________________, to be published in thejournal _____________________________,volume____,number _____,year________in physical copies in the institutional portal, website or any known or future means, I express my willingness to give gratuitously the economic rights arising from the aforementioned article, in favor of the University of Santo Tomás, (hereinafter ASSIGNEE) specifically for the Journal_______________________in volume and year mentioned above.
THE ASSIGNOR declares that all contents of the aforementioned works are of his own, which are unpublished, that are not being evaluated by another institution, who has alienated them to third parties, which has no legal or contractual restriction that prohibits you authorize open publication and print media, digital access and make it visible in the databases and indexes where the magazine be indexed; The assignor is willing to go to sanitation by any action claim, plagiarism or other type of claim that might arise in this regard.
For all purposes to which it has place the applicable law in respect of this assignment will be legislation on the rights of prime author in the territory of Colombia as well as international treaties on this matter are accepted and incorporated into national legislation and additional legislation is issued on the matter.
Under this assignment, the assignee is authorized to copy, reproduce, distribute, publish, market the article under the transfer by any digital means, electronic or photocopying, known or unknown, retaining the obligation to respect in any case the author's moral rights contained in Article 30 of law 23 of 1982, law 1450 of 2011 and law 1520 of 2012.
It is signed in acceptance to the____day of ______
