La fundamental convergencia teórica entre el pensamiento económico de la escuela monetarista de Chicago y el de los sociólogos constructivistas moderados: Teleología, epistemología y metodología
The Fundamental Theoretical Convergence Between the Economic Thought of the Monetarist Chicago School and of the Moderate Constructivist Sociologists (I of II).
Abstract (en)
This research aims to demonstrate the fundamental theoretical convergence between the contributions from the economists of the monetarist Chicago school and from the moderate constructivist sociologists. For this purpose, we group these contributions around three categories: teleology, epistemology and methodology. In view of the results, we conclude that, despite the different priority displayed by these authors to their interests, all of them coincide, on the one hand, in the epistemological sphere, in using hypothetic-deductive rules that incorporate considerations, both logical and factual; and, on the other, in the methodological camp, by the use of tools, both logical-deductive, and empirical-analytical.Abstract (es)
Esta investigación pretende demostrar la fundamental convergencia teórica existente entre las aportaciones procedentes de los economistas de la escuela monetarista de Chicago y las de los sociólogos constructivistas moderados. Con tal propósito, agrupamos estas contribuciones en torno a tres categorías: teleología, epistemología y metodología. En vista de los resultados, concluimos que, pese a los diferentes intereses prioritarios que exhiben estos autores, todos ellos coinciden, por una parte, en la esfera epistemológica, en valerse de reglas hipotético deductivas que incorporan consideraciones, tanto lógicas, como factuales; y por otra, en el campo metodológico, en el uso de herramientas, tanto lógico-deductivas, como empírico-analíticas.
References
Bell, D. (2001). El advenimiento de la sociedad posindustrial. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
Bell, D. (1989). Las contradicciones culturales del capitalismo. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
Bell, D. (2015). Retorno al final de la ideología. En Bell, D. El final de la ideología (pp. 93-172). Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
Bell, D. (1980). Models and reality in the economic discourse. Public Interest, (Special Issue), 46-80.
Beck, U. (1998). La sociedad del riesgo. Barcelona: Paidós.
Bourdieu, P. (2006). La distinción. Criterio y bases sociales del gusto. Buenos Aires: Taurus.
Castells, M. (2005). La era de la información, vol. I: la sociedad red. (3.ª ed.). Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
Castells, M. (1998). La era de la información, vol. II: el poder de la identidad. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
Castells, M. (1998). La era de la información, vol. III: fin de milenio. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
Castells, M., y De Ípola, E. (1981). Práctica epistemológica y ciencias sociales, o como desarrollar la lucha de clases en el plano teórico sin internarse en la metafísica. En M. Castells y E. De Ípola, E, Metodología y epistemología de las ciencias sociales (pp. 131-224). Madrid: Ayuso.
Drucker, P. F. (1969). The age of discontinuity. Guidelines to our changing society. Londres: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Drucker, P. F. (1990). Managing the non-profit organization: Practices and principles. Londres: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Drucker, P. F. (1993). La sociedad poscapitalista. Barcelona: Apóstrofe.
Friedman, M. (1953). The methodology of positive economics. En D. Hausman (Ed.), The philosophy of economics. An anthology (pp. 145-178). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511819025.010.
Friedman, M. (1993). Teoría de los precios. Barcelona: Altaya.
Friedman, M. (31 de diciembre, 1965). We are all keynesians now. Time.
Friedman, M. (1968a). Dollars and deficits. Nueva Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Friedman, M. (1968b). The role of monetary policy. The American Economic Review, 58(1), 1-17.
Friedman, M. (1970). A theoretical framework for monetary analysis. The Journal of Political Economy, 78(2), 193-238. doi:10.1086/259623.
Friedman, M., y Schwartz, A. J. (1963). A monetary history of the United States 1867-1960. Princeton: Princeton University Press. doi:10.2307/3112083.
Giddens, A. (1995). La constitución de la sociedad: bases para la teoría de la estructuración. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu.
Habermas, J. (1968). Conocimiento e interés. En M. Jiménez (Ed.), Jürgen Habermas. Conocimiento e Interés. Edmund Husserl. La Filosofía en la Crisis de la Humanidad Europea (pp. 33-47). Valencia: Uníversitat de Valencia.
Lamo de Espinosa, E. (2001). La sociología del siglo XX. REIS. Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas, 96, 21-49. doi:10.2307/40184382.
Phillips, A. W. (1958). The relationship between unemployment and the rate of change of money wages in the United Kingdom 1861-1957. Economica New Series 25(100), 283-299. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0335.1958.tb00003.x.
Stigler, G. J. (1942). The Theory of Price. Nueva York: The MacMillan Company.
Stigler, G. J. (1954). The early history of empirical studies of consumer behavior. The Journal of Political Economy, 62(2), 95-113. doi: 10.1086/257495
Stigler, G. J. (1957). Perfect competition, historically contemplated. The Journal of Political Economy, 65(1), 1-17. doi:10.1086/257878.
Stigler, G. J. (1964). A theory of oligopoly. The Journal of Political Economy, 72(1), 44-61. doi:10.1086/258853.
Stigler, G. J. (1965). Essays in the history of economics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Stigler, G. J. (1982). The process and progress of economics. Nobel memorial lecture, 8 December, 1982. En K. Mäller (Ed.), Nobel lectures in economic sciences. 1981-1990 (pp. 57-76). Singapur: World Scientific Publishing Co.
Stigler, G. J. (1987). The theory of price. (4.ª ed.). Nueva York: MacMillan Publishing Company.
Stigler, G. J. (1992). Law or economics? Journal of Law and Economics, 35(2), 455-468. doi:10.1086/467262.
Vaihinger, H. (1968). The philosophy of “as if'” A system of the theoretical, practical and religious fictions of mankind. Londres: Routledge.
How to Cite
License
CIFE Journal is under license Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
ASSIGNMENT OF AUTHOR'S PATRIMONIAL RIGHTS
_____________________,adult, identified with citizenship card No. _________ issued in the city of____________,henceforth the Assignor, in my capacity as author of the article __________________________________________________, to be published in thejournal _____________________________,volume____,number _____,year________in physical copies in the institutional portal, website or any known or future means, I express my willingness to give gratuitously the economic rights arising from the aforementioned article, in favor of the University of Santo Tomás, (hereinafter ASSIGNEE) specifically for the Journal_______________________in volume and year mentioned above.
THE ASSIGNOR declares that all contents of the aforementioned works are of his own, which are unpublished, that are not being evaluated by another institution, who has alienated them to third parties, which has no legal or contractual restriction that prohibits you authorize open publication and print media, digital access and make it visible in the databases and indexes where the magazine be indexed; The assignor is willing to go to sanitation by any action claim, plagiarism or other type of claim that might arise in this regard.
For all purposes to which it has place the applicable law in respect of this assignment will be legislation on the rights of prime author in the territory of Colombia as well as international treaties on this matter are accepted and incorporated into national legislation and additional legislation is issued on the matter.
Under this assignment, the assignee is authorized to copy, reproduce, distribute, publish, market the article under the transfer by any digital means, electronic or photocopying, known or unknown, retaining the obligation to respect in any case the author's moral rights contained in Article 30 of law 23 of 1982, law 1450 of 2011 and law 1520 of 2012.
It is signed in acceptance to the____day of ______
