Publicado
2023-06-15

Breaking Boundaries: How Indonesia’s Limited Territorial Jurisdiction Sparked a Global Movement to Solve Extradition Woes

Rompiendo Barreras: Cómo la Jurisdicción Territorial Limitada de Indonesia Desencadenó un Movimiento Global para Resolver los Problemas de Extradición

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15332/19090528.9731
Joko Setiyono
Eddy Pratomo

Resumen (es)

Este artículo que induce a la reflexión explora el intrigante problema de la jurisdicción geográfica limitada de Indonesia en relación con la implementación de tratados de extradición. La extradición, el proceso de devolver a los fugitivos para que enfrenten la justicia, se dificulta con frecuencia debido a unos obstáculos legales complejos derivados de la membresía de un país a las Naciones Unidas y su compromiso con los principios y valores de los derechos humanos. Debido a su jurisdicción legal o a las preocupaciones sobre las violaciones de los derechos humanos, muchas naciones no están obligadas a entregar a los sospechosos, lo que representa una dificultad única para Indonesia. Pero no todo está perdido. La cooperación internacional y el desarrollo de acuerdos de extradición pueden servir como una hoja de ruta para las naciones que buscan mejorar sus prácticas de extradición. Los países pueden negociar acuerdos multilaterales o regionales que satisfagan las preocupaciones e intereses de todas las partes mediante la comprensión de las complejidades del proceso de extradición, como la lista de delitos extraditables y el derecho internacional consuetudinario. El presente trabajo sugiere que las naciones investiguen modelos legales y tratados de extradición que ofrezcan soluciones viables para superar estos obstáculos. Al colaborar e intercambiar información, podemos superar las barreras de acceso a la justicia y garantizar que los fugitivos enfrenten las consecuencias de sus acciones, independientemente de dónde se escondan.

Palabras clave (es): extradición, jurisdicción territorial limitada de Indonesia, tratado de extradición

Resumen (en)

This thought-provoking paper explores the intriguing issue of Indonesia’s limited geographical jurisdiction concerning extradition treaty implementation. Extradition, the process of returning fugitives to face justice, is frequently impeded by complex legal obstacles stemming from a country’s membership in the United Nations and commitment to human rights principles and values. Due  to their legal jurisdiction or concerns regarding human rights violations, many nations are not obligated to deliver over suspects, posing a unique difficulty for Indonesia. Nevertheless, there is optimism. International cooperation and the development of extradition agreements can serve as a road map for nations seeking to enhance their extradition practices. Countries can negotiate multilateral or regional agreements that satisfy the concerns and interests of all parties by comprehending the complexities of the extradition process, such as the list of extraditable offences and customary international law. Our paper suggests that nations investigate legal models and extradition treaties that offer viable solutions for overcoming these obstacles. By collaborating and sharing information, we can surmount obstacles to justice and ensure that fugitives face the consequences of their actions, regardless of where they hide.

Palabras clave (en): extradition, Indonesia’s limited territorial jurisdiction, extradition treaty
Joko Setiyono, Universitas Diponegoro

Professor, Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro. PhD in Law. Jalan dr. Antonius Suroyo, Tembalang, Semarang, Jawa Tengah 50275, Indonesia. Email: [email protected]; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0005-6568-7506

Eddy Pratomo, Universitas Pancasila

Professor, Faculty of Law, Universitas Pancasila. PhD in Law. Jalan Buku Dikrama No.30, RT.5/RW.5, Srengseng Sawah, South Jakarta City, Special Capital District of Jakarta 12640, Indonesia. Email: [email protected]; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0005-5804-4481 

Referencias

Acharya, S. (2014). Extradition Law; Issues and Challenges. SSRN. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2525094

Agusman, D. D. (2010). Hukum perjanjian internasional: kajian teori dan praktik Indonesia. Refika Aditama.

Arshad, A. (2016, April 22). Tycoon Hartawan Aluwi in Indonesia custody for suspected fraud after being ‘removed’ from Singapore. The Straits Times. https://www.straitstimes.com/asia/se-asia/tycoon-hartawan-aluwi-in-indonesia-custody-for-suspected-fraud-after-being-removed-from

Bianchi, A. (1997). Venezia v. Ministero di Grazia E Giustizia. American Journal of International Law, 91(4), 727–733. https://doi.org/10.2307/2998103

Brownlie, I. (2008). Principles of Public International Law. Oxford University Press.

Caruso, C. A. (2006). Overcoming Legal Challenges in Extradition. American Bar Association – Asia Law Initiative. https://studyres.com/doc/16482975/overcoming-legal-challenges-to-extradition

Chhabra, S. (2014). Nationality and Extradition. RGNUL Law Review, 4(2). https://ssrn.com/abstract=2853990

Council of Europe. (1950). European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, as amended by Protocols Nos. 11 and 14, 4 November 1950, ETS 5. https://www.refworld.org/docid/3ae6b3b04.html

Council of Europe: European Court of Human Rights. (1989). Soering v. The United Kingdom, 1/1989/161/217, July 7, 1989. Refworld. https://www.refworld.org/cases,ECHR,3ae6b6fec.html

Greenman, K. (2015). A castle built on sand? Article 3 ECHR and the source of risk in non-refoulement obligations in international law. International Journal of Refugee Law, 27(2), 264–296. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijrl/eev018

Harris, D. (2004). Case and Materials on International Law. Sweet and Maxwell.

Human Rights Watch. (2015, January 15). Dispatches: Indonesia’s Death Penalty Double Standard. https://www.hrw.org/news/2015/01/15/dispatches-indonesias-death-penalty-double-standard

Jafari Langroodi, M. J. (1998). Law terminology (10th Ed.). Ganje Danesh.

Kaczorowska-Ireland, A. (2010). Public International Law (4th Ed.). Routledge, https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203848470

Lewis, M. K. (2007, July). Mutual legal assistance and extradition: human rights implications. In China Rights Forum (No. 2). https://ssrn.com/abstract=1432469

Mann, M., Warren, I., & Kennedy, S. (2018). The legal geographies of transnational cyber-prosecutions: extradition, human rights and forum shifting. Global crime, 19(2), 107–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/17440572.2018.1448272

Mannheim, H. (1935). Some Recent Problems in the Law of Extradition. Transactions of the Grotius Society, 21, 109–125. https://www.jstor.org/stable/743066

Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Indonesia. (2018, March 31). Pertemuan Kelompok Kerja tentang Model Perjanjian Ekstradisi di ASEAN VIII, Bangkok, 26 Maret 2018. https://pustakahpi.kemlu.go.id/content.php?content=file_detailinfo&id=207

Mohamed and Another v President of the Republic of South Africa and Others (Society for the Abolition of the Death Penalty in South Africa and Another intervening) 2001 3 SA 893 (CC), 2001 7 BCLR 685 (CC).

OHCHR. (2016, July 28). UN human rights experts urge Indonesia to halt new wave of executions. https://www.ohchr.org/EN/NewsEvents/Pages/DisplayNews.aspx?NewsID=20308&LangID=E

Roecks, C. R. (1994). Extradition, Human Rights, and the Death Penalty: When Nations Must Refuse to Extradite a Person Charged with a Capital Crime. California Western International Law Journal, 25(1), 189–234.

Ryngaert, C. (2008). Jurisdiction in International Law (1st Ed.). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199544714.001.0001

Saul, B. (2014). Terrorism as a Transnational Crime. In N. Boister & R. Currie (Eds.), Handbook of Transnational Criminal Law (pp. 394–408). Routledge. https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.4324/9780203380277.ch24

Setiyono, J. (2015). Hukum Pidana Internasional. Universitas Terbuka.

Sinclair, I. (1984). The Vienna Convention on the law of treaties. Manchester University Press.

Stigall, D. E. (2013). Ungoverned spaces, transnational crime, and the prohibition on extraterritorial enforcement jurisdiction in international law. 3 Notre Dame J. Int’l & Comp. L., 1. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2211219

Suryokusumo, S. (2010). Hukum pidana internasional: ekstradisi. Tatanusa.

van der Wilt, H. (2018). Extradition and Mutual Legal Assistance in the Draft Convention on Crimes against Humanity. Journal of International Criminal Justice, 16(4), 795–812. https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqy037

Waryenti, D. (2014). Ekstradisi dan Beberapa Permasalahannya. Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v5no2.64

Dimensions

PlumX

Visitas

232

Descargas

Los datos de descarga aún no están disponibles.

Cómo citar

Setiyono, J., & Pratomo, E. (2023). Rompiendo Barreras: Cómo la Jurisdicción Territorial Limitada de Indonesia Desencadenó un Movimiento Global para Resolver los Problemas de Extradición. Via Inveniendi Et Iudicandi, 18(2), 72-94. https://doi.org/10.15332/19090528.9731