El liberalismo, una revisión de literatura entre los siglos XVII al XXI


  • Jairo Camilo Zamora Escobar
  • Yuneisy Lagos Duarte
  • Laura Daniela Caro Álvarez



Palabras clave:

liberalismo, filosofía, relaciones internacionales, economía, Estado, teoría del liberalismo


Este artículo abarca el concepto de ‘relaciones internacionales’ para desglosar, a su vez, el concepto de ‘relaciones’, lo cual lleva a cuestionar el liberalismo y su evolución histórica hasta el siglo XXI. Así, pretende describir cómo se puede elaborar un análisis retórico de la perspectiva teórica del liberalismo, su desarrollo como teoría y su aporte a las relaciones internacionales. A través de los siglos analizados, se exponen los principales rasgos del liberalismo, así como las mentes que ayudaron a crear las doctrinas y estructuras que lo caracterizan y que le dieron nuevas formas a las economías y los Gobiernos de los países. El liberalismo es un pensamiento filosófico que, más allá de ser un partido político, fue adoptado por la educación humanista; sin embargo, hoy en día tiene connotaciones negativas, aunque fue más aceptado que el conservadurismo. Grandes filósofos y economistas han aportado a la estructura del liberalismo como lo conocemos hoy, lo que ha tenido grandes impactos en la sociedad y en la economía del presente, por lo que se puede afirmar que el liberalismo ha sido de gran impacto para el mundo occidental. 


Addams, J. (2002). Democracy and Social Ethics. University of Illinois Press.

Bashota, B. (2016). The Role of Theory of International Relations in Explicating Global Political Events. ILIRIA International Review, 1(1), 37. Https://www.researchgate.net/publication/306526649_The_role_of_theory_of_international_relations_in_explicating_global_political_events.

Bastiat, F. (1849). The Law.

Berlin, I. (2017). Two Concepts of Liberty. En David Miller (comp.), Liberty Reader (pp. 33-57). Routledge.

Beveridge, W. H. (1942). Social Insurance and Allied Services: Beveridge Report. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.

Bird, A. (2012). “The Structure of Scientific Revolutions” and its Significance: An Essay Review of the Fiftieth Anniversary Edition. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 63(4):859-883. Https://www.researchgate.net/publication/260138780_The_Structure_of_Scientific_Revolutions_and_its_Significance_An_Essay_Review_of_the_Fiftieth_Anniversary_Edition.

Boesche, R. (2019). The Strange Liberalism of Alexis de Tocqueville. Cornell University Press.

Buchan, B. (2002). Explaining War and Peace: Kant and Liberal IR Theory. Alternatives, 27(4), 407-428. Https://doi.org/10.1177/030437540202700401.

Burchill, S., Linklater, A., Devetak, R., Donnelly, J., Paterson, M., Reus-Smit, C., y True, J. (2013). Theories of International Relations (3.a ed.). Palgrave Macmillan.

Buzan, B. y Lawson, G. (2018). Explanation, Geopolitics, and Liberalism: A Reply to Luke Cooper. Journal of Historical Sociology, 31(1), e92-e97. Https://doi.org/10.1111/johs.12160.

De Gouges, O. (1791). Declaration of the Rights of Woman and the Female Citizen. En Lynn Hun (ed.), The French Revolution and Human Rights: A Brief Documentary History, 124-129.

Deudney, D. e Ikenberry, G. J. (1999). The Nature and Sources of Liberal International Order. Review of International Studies, 25(2), 179-196. Https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210599001795.

Donnelly, J. (2012). The Differentiation of International Societies: An Approach to Structural International Theory. European Journal of International Relations, 18(1), 151-176. Https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066111411208.

Donnelly, J. (2019). Systems, Levels, and Structural Theory: Waltz’s Theory Is Not a Systemic Theory (And Why That Matters for International Relations Today). European Journal of International Relations, 25(3), 904-930. Https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066118820929.

Drezner, D. W. (2019). Technological Change and International Relations. International Relations, 33(2), 286-303. Https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117819834629.

Eadeh, F. R. y Chang, K. K. (2020). Can Threat Increase Support for Liberalism? New Insights Into the Relationship Between Threat and Political Attitudes. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(1), 88-96. Https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550618815919.

Elman, C. y Elman, M. F. (2008). The Role of History in International Relations. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 37(2), 357-364. Https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829808097644.

Eriksson, J. y Giacomello, G. (2006). The Information Revolution, Security, and International Relations: (IR)Relevant Theory? International Political Science Review, 27(3), 221-244. Https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512106064462.

Frieden, J. A. y Lake, D. A. (2005). International Relations as a Social Science: Rigor and Relevance. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 600(1), 136-156. Https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716205276732.

Fukuyama, F. (1992). The End of History and the Last Man. Penguin.

Gibbons, M. (1999). Science’s New Social Contract With Society. Nature, 402(6761), C81-C84. Https://doi.org/10.1038/35011576.

Gilbert, A. N. (1968). International Relations and the Relevance of History. International Studies Quarterly, 12(4), 351-359. Https://doi.org/10.2307/3013522.

Grancay, M. y Szikorova, N. (2014). Liberalism in Foreign Trade Versus Liberalism in Air Transportation Is There a Link? Panoeconomicus, 61(6), 709-721. Https://doi.org/10.2298/PAN1406709G.

Harrison, K. y Boyd, T. (2018). Liberalism. Understanding Political Ideas and Movements, 196-203. Https://doi.org/10.7765/9781526137951.00014.

Hasson, Y., Tamir, M., Brahms, K. S., Cohrs, J. C., y Halperin, E. (2018). Are Liberals and Conservatives Equally Motivated to Feel Empathy Toward Others? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44(10), 1449-1459. Https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167218769867.

Hayek, F. A. (1944). The Road to Serfdom. Dymock’s Book Arcade.

Hayek, F. A. (1960). The Constitution of Liberty. Gateway Edition.

Hayek, F. A. (1988). The Fatal Conceit: The Errors of Socialism.

Hobbes, T. (1969). Leviathan, 1651. Scolar P.

Hobson, J. M. y Lawson, G. (2008). What is History in International Relations? Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 37(2), 415-435. Https://doi.org/10.1177/030582980809.

Hodgskin, T. (1900). Labour Defended Against the Claims of Capital. Beijing Book Co. Inc.

Ikenberry, G. J. (2009). Liberalism in a Realist World. International Studies, 46(1-2), 203-219. Https://doi.org/10.1177/002088171004600213.

Kant, I. (1781). Critique of Pure Reason. St. Martins.

Kant, I. (1983). Perpetual Peace and Other Essays. Hackett Publishing.

Keohane, R. O. (2012). Twenty Years of Institutional Liberalism. International Relations, 26(2), 125-138. Https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117812438451.

Keynes, J. M. (2018). The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money. Springer.

Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press.

Lebow, R. N. (2011). Philosophy and International Relations. International Affairs, 87(5), 1219-1228. Https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2011.01030.x.

Lees, N. (2016). International Society Is to International System as World Society Is to …? Systemic and Societal Processes in English School Theory. Journal of International Relations and Development, (19), 285-311. Https://doi.org/10.1057/jird.2014.20.

Lijphart, A. (1974). The Structure of the Theoretical Revolution in International Relations. International Studies Quarterly, 18(1), 41-74. Https://doi.org/10.2307/2600260.

Locke, J. (1689). A Letter Concerning Toleration. Churchill.

Locke, J. (1966). The Second Treatise of Government (An Essay Concerning the True Original Extent and End of Civil Government) And a Letter Concerning Toleration. Barnes & Noble.

Martineau, H. (1832). Illustrations of Political Economy (vol. 1). E. Littell.

Martineau, H. (1837). Society in America (vol. 2). Saunders and Otley.

McGlinchey, S. (2017). International Relations Theory. E-International Relations.

Mengistie, S. (2013). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Thomas S. Kuhn, 1970, 2nd Ed. Chicago, London: University of Chicago Press Ltd. 210 Pages). Philosophical Papers and Review, 4(4), 41-48. Https://doi.org/10.5897/PPR2013.0102.

Mill, H. T. (1868). The Enfranchisement of Women. Trübner and Co.

Mill, J. S. (1859). On Liberty.

Montesquieu, C. (1989). The Spirit of the Laws. Cambridge University Press.

Moravcsik, A. (1997). Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics. International Organization, 51(4), 513-553. Https://doi.org/10.1162/002081897550447.

Owen, J. M. (2018). Liberalism and Its Alternatives, Again. International Studies Review, 20(2), 309-316. Https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viy026.

Paine, T. (2011). Rights of Man. Broadview Press.

Rand, A. (1943). The Fountainhead. Signet.

Rawls, J. (2005). Political Liberalism. Columbia University Press.

Rawls, J. (2009). A Theory of Justice. Harvard University Press.

Shklar, J. (1984). Putting Cruelty First. Ordinary Vices. https://www.dissentmagazine.org/wp-content/files_mf/1389811110d4Shklar.pdf

Segrillo, A. (2012). Liberalism, Marxism and Democratic Theory Revisited: Proposal of a Joint Index of Political and Economic Democracy. Brazilian Political Science Review, 6(2), 8-27. Https://www.scielo.br/j/bpsr/a/6XjtSXLrNpf7nY7qXPFb6FF/?lang=en.

Shimko, K. I. (1992). Realism, Neorealism, and American Liberalism. The Review of Politics, 54(2), 281-301. Http://www.jstor.org/stable/1407486.

Shiping, T. (2014). International System, Not International Structure: Against the Agent-Structure Problematique in IR. The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 7(4), 483-506. Https://doi.org/10.1093/cjip/pou046.

Shklar, J. (1989). The Liberalism of Fear. En Nancy L. Rosenblum (ed.), Political Liberalism and the Moral Life, 21-38. Harvard University Press.

Smith, A. (1776). An Inquiry Into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Verl. Wirtschaft und Finanzen.

Spencer, H. (1993). The Man Versus the State (1884). En John Offer (ed.), Spencer: Political Writings. Cambridge University Press.

Spinoza, B. (2007). Spinoza: Theological-Political Treatise. Cambridge University Press.

T. E., A. H. B. y J. L. (2018, 29 de agosto). The Literature of Liberalism. The Economist. Https://www.economist.com/open-future/2018/08/29/the-literature-of-liberalism.

Tocqueville, A. (2000). Democracy in America. University of Chicago Press.

Walt, S. (1998). International Relations: One World, Many Theories. Foreign Policy, (110), 29-46. Https://doi.org/10.2307/1149275.

Waltz, K. N. (2007). Theory of International Politics. McGraw-Hill.

Williams, M. C. (2013). In the Beginning: The International Relations Enlightenment and the Ends of International Relations Theory. European Journal of International Relations, 19(3), 647-665. Https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066113495477.

Wilson, P. (2011). Gilbert Murray and International Relations: Hellenism, Liberalism, and International Intellectual Cooperation as a Path to Peace. Review of International Studies, 37(2), 881-909. Https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210510000744.

Witt, M. A. (2019). De-globalization: Theories, Predictions, and Opportunities for International Business Research. Journal of International Business Studies, 50(7), 1053-1077. Https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-019-00219-7.

Wollstonecraft, M. (1989). A Vindication of the Rights of Woman. En Jane Todd (ed.), The Works of Mary Wollstonecraft. Routledge.

Xidias, J. y Jackson, I. (2017). The End of History and the Last Man. Macat Library.




Cómo citar

Zamora Escobar, J. C., Lagos Duarte, Y., & Caro Álvarez, L. D. (2023). El liberalismo, una revisión de literatura entre los siglos XVII al XXI . Episteme. Revista De divulgación En Estudios Socioterritoriales, 15(1), 136–159. https://doi.org/10.15332/27113833.8469