Contraste entre los determinantes de la inversión en I&D y del registro de patentes en sectores industriales de Colombia
Contrast between determinants of investment in R&D and patent registration in industrial sectors of Colombia
Abstract (en)
In this research are contrasted the determinants of R&D investment and patent count of industries belonging to an emerging country. In many studies is common to consider indistinctly these indicators as a proxy of innovation performance. However, this research shows that R&D investment and patent count are two different behavior: these don not have necessarily a direct relationship and the same determinants. It was used de data provided for third survey of Innovation and Technology Development (in forward EDIT) (DANE–DNP–COLCIENCIAS). The results obtained suggest that the institutional and technological conditions of Colombia are reflected in some relationships between innovation determinants and both innovation performance indicators used different from that observed in industrialized countries.
Abstract (es)
Esta investigación contrasta los determinantes del esfuerzo innovador y del conteo de patentes de sectores industriales de una economía emergente. En muchos estudios se tiende a considerar el gasto en I&D y el conteo de patentes como indicadores de desempeño innovador. Sin embargo, el presente trabajo prueba que el esfuerzo innovador y el registro de patentes son dos comportamientos diferentes, no directamente relacionados y sin los mismos determinantes. Se usan datos provenientes de la tercera encuesta de desarrollo e innovación tecnológica (DANE–DNP–COLCIENCIAS). Los resultados sugieren que las condiciones del desarrollo tecnológico e institucional de Colombia se reflejan en relaciones entre determinantes y los dos indicadores de desempeño innovador, distintas de las que se observan en países industrializados.
References
Aboites, J. (2003). Innovación, patentes y globalización. En J. Aboites y G. Dutrénit (eds.), Innovación, aprendizaje y creación de capacidades tecnológica (pp. 163-206). México: Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, Unidad Xochimilco.
Akiyama, T., & Furukawa, Y. (2009). Intellectual property rights and appropriability of innovation. Economics Letters, 103(3), 138-141.
Altenburg, T. (2009). Building inclusive innovation systems in developing countries: Challenges for IS research. En B-A. Lundvall, K. J. Joseph, C. Chaminade & J. Vang (eds.), Handbook of Innovation Systems and Developing Countries (pp. 33- 56).
Cheltenham, UK – Northampton, U.S.A.: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
Baldwin J., Gellatly, G., & Gaudreault, V. (2002). Financing innovation in new small firms: New evidence from Canada (Statistics Canada Analytical Studies Series 11F0019MIE, documento de trabajo n.o 190).
Becheikh, N., Landry, R., & Amara, N. (2006). Lessons from innovation empirical studies in the manufacturing sector: A systematic review of the literature from 1993- 2003. Technovation, 26(5-6), 644-664.
Bhattacharya, M., & Bloch, H. (2004). Determinants of innovation. Small Business Economics, 22(2), 155-162.
Blomqvist, K., & Levy, J. (2006). Collaboration capability. A focal concept in knowledge creation and collaborative innovation in networks. International Journal of Management Concepts and Philosophy, 2(2), 31-48.
Brouwer, E., & Kleinknecht, A. (1999). Innovative output and a firm propensity to patent. An exploration of CIS micro data. Research Policy, 28(6), 615-624.
Bruland, C., & Mowery, D. (2005). Innovation through time. En J. Fagerberg, D. Mowery & R. Nelson (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Innovation (pp. 349 -379). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Cantwell, J., & Piscitello, L. (2005). Recent location of foreign-owned research and development activities by large multinational corporations in the European regions: The role of spillovers and externalities. Regional Studies, 39(1), 1-16.
Cantwell, J., & Molero, J. (eds.). (2003). Multinational enterprises, innovative strategies and systems of innovation. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
Chaminade, C., Lundvall, B-A., Vang, J., & Joseph, K. J. (2009). Designing innovation policies for development. En B-A. Lundvall, K.
How to Cite
License
CIFE Journal is under license Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
ASSIGNMENT OF AUTHOR'S PATRIMONIAL RIGHTS
_____________________,adult, identified with citizenship card No. _________ issued in the city of____________,henceforth the Assignor, in my capacity as author of the article __________________________________________________, to be published in thejournal _____________________________,volume____,number _____,year________in physical copies in the institutional portal, website or any known or future means, I express my willingness to give gratuitously the economic rights arising from the aforementioned article, in favor of the University of Santo Tomás, (hereinafter ASSIGNEE) specifically for the Journal_______________________in volume and year mentioned above.
THE ASSIGNOR declares that all contents of the aforementioned works are of his own, which are unpublished, that are not being evaluated by another institution, who has alienated them to third parties, which has no legal or contractual restriction that prohibits you authorize open publication and print media, digital access and make it visible in the databases and indexes where the magazine be indexed; The assignor is willing to go to sanitation by any action claim, plagiarism or other type of claim that might arise in this regard.
For all purposes to which it has place the applicable law in respect of this assignment will be legislation on the rights of prime author in the territory of Colombia as well as international treaties on this matter are accepted and incorporated into national legislation and additional legislation is issued on the matter.
Under this assignment, the assignee is authorized to copy, reproduce, distribute, publish, market the article under the transfer by any digital means, electronic or photocopying, known or unknown, retaining the obligation to respect in any case the author's moral rights contained in Article 30 of law 23 of 1982, law 1450 of 2011 and law 1520 of 2012.
It is signed in acceptance to the____day of ______
